diff options
author | Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net> | 2010-05-06 21:39:43 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net> | 2010-05-12 18:09:55 -0700 |
commit | 65cedf39054cf3a1e695e84ac228cce9e8d48097 (patch) | |
tree | 9a0b41cf70562a6e9e06263486f2fcf1552da46a /hw/xfree86/xaa | |
parent | afcbbd6dfea51c5b0adca0d720edc02ba0c2dc16 (diff) |
Kill DoChangeGC in favor of dixChangeGC.
This doesn't change any behavior, but it isn't clear whether NullClient
is correct in all cases. As ajax says,
> For most of these changes, I think it's correct to use NullClient,
> since they are server-initiated changes and should not fail for (eg)
> xace reasons. ... At any rate, you're certainly not changing any
> semantics by leaving them all as NullClient, so this patch can't be
> more wrong than before.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/xfree86/xaa')
-rw-r--r-- | hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaPCache.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaPCache.c b/hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaPCache.c index e78a6f82f..e62f28083 100644 --- a/hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaPCache.c +++ b/hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaPCache.c @@ -1881,7 +1881,7 @@ XAAWriteBitmapToCacheLinear( pGC = GetScratchGC(pScreenPix->drawable.depth, pScreen); gcvals[0] = fg; gcvals[1] = bg; - DoChangeGC(pGC, GCForeground | GCBackground, gcvals, 0); + dixChangeGC(NullClient, pGC, GCForeground | GCBackground, gcvals, NULL); ValidateGC((DrawablePtr)pDstPix, pGC); /* We've unwrapped already so these ops miss a sync */ |