diff options
author | njn <njn@a5019735-40e9-0310-863c-91ae7b9d1cf9> | 2006-03-28 00:05:16 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | njn <njn@a5019735-40e9-0310-863c-91ae7b9d1cf9> | 2006-03-28 00:05:16 +0000 |
commit | 390aa54633c4ec46fcbb35fc8706a5ca14ef76b8 (patch) | |
tree | b6684dc1ad6173b95333ffbd4d86e7cf611fbf39 /NEWS | |
parent | a3e967692fc2ac13d0a5227e5a09a95127bd7656 (diff) |
tweak
git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@5794 a5019735-40e9-0310-863c-91ae7b9d1cf9
Diffstat (limited to 'NEWS')
-rw-r--r-- | NEWS | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ Performance (especially of Memcheck) is much improved, XXX... In detail: - Performance is much improved: programs typically run 1.20--1.40 times - faster under Memcheck, with an average of about 1.30 for the programs we - tested it on. The improvements for Nulgrind are similar. We haven't - measured Cachegrind and Massif, they should be also be faster, but with a - smaller improvement. We are interested to hear what speed-ups users get. + faster under Memcheck (much more for some unusual programs) with an + average of about 1.30 for the programs we tested it on. The improvements + for Nulgrind are similar. We haven't measured Cachegrind and Massif, they + should be also be faster, but with smaller improvements. We are + interested to hear what speed-ups users get. - Memcheck uses much less memory. The amount of shadow memory used -- which accounts for a large percentage of all of Memcheck's memory overhead -- |