path: root/specs/ch02.xml

<chapter id='keyboard_state'>
<title>Keyboard State</title>
<para>
The core protocol description of
keyboard state consists of eight <emphasis>
modifiers</emphasis>
(<emphasis>
Shift</emphasis>
, <emphasis>
Lock</emphasis>
, <emphasis>
Control</emphasis>
, and <emphasis>
Mod1</emphasis>
-<emphasis>
Mod5</emphasis>
). A modifier reports the state of one or modifier keys, which are similar to
qualifier keys as defined by the ISO9995 standard:
</para>

<variablelist>
  <varlistentry>
    <term>Qualifier key</term>
    <listitem>
      <para>
A key whose operation
has no immediate effect, but which, for as long as it is held down, modifies
the effect of other keys. A qualifier key may be, for example, a shift key or a
control key.
      </para>
    </listitem>
  </varlistentry>
</variablelist>

<para>
Whenever a modifier key is physically or logically depressed, the modifier it
controls is set in the keyboard state. The protocol implies that certain
modifier keys lock (i.e. affect modifier state after they have been physically
released) but does not explicitly discuss locking keys or their behavior. The
current modifier state is reported to clients in a number of core protocol
events and can be determined using the <emphasis>
QueryPointer</emphasis>
 request.
</para>

<para>
The XKB extension retains the eight "real" modifiers defined by the core
protocol but extends the core protocol notion of <emphasis>
keyboard state</emphasis>
 to include up to four <emphasis>
keysym groups</emphasis>
, as defined by the ISO9995 standard:
</para>


<variablelist>
  <varlistentry>
    <term>Group:</term>
    <listitem>
      <para>
A logical state of a keyboard providing
access to a collection of characters. A group usually contains a set of
characters which logically belong together and which may be arranged on several
shift levels within that group.
      </para>
    </listitem>
  </varlistentry>
</variablelist>

<para>
For example, keyboard group can be used to select between multiple alphabets on
a single keyboard, or to access less-commonly used symbols within a character
set.
</para>

<sect1 id='locking_and_latching_modifiers_and_groups'>
<title>Locking and Latching Modifiers and Groups</title>
<para>
With the core protocol, there is no way to
tell whether a modifier is set due to a lock or because the user is actually
holding down a key; this can make for a clumsy user-interface as locked
modifiers or group state interfere with accelerators and translations.
</para>
<para>
XKB adds explicit support for locking
and latching modifiers and groups. Locked modifiers or groups apply to all
future key events until they are explicitly changed. Latched modifiers or
groups apply only to the next key event that does not change keyboard state.
</para>

</sect1>
<sect1 id="fundamental_components_of_xkb_keyboard_state">
<title>Fundamental Components of XKB Keyboard State</title>
<para>
The fundamental components of XKB keyboard state include:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
  <para>The locked modifiers and group</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>The latched modifiers and group</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>The base modifiers and group (for which keys are physically or
logically down)
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>The effective modifiers and group (the cumulative effect of the base,
locked and latched modifier and group states).
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>State of the core pointer buttons.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
The latched and locked state of modifiers and groups can be changed in response
to keyboard activity or under application control using the <emphasis>
XkbLatchLockState</emphasis>
 request. The base modifier, base group
and pointer button states always reflect the logical state of the keyboard and
pointer and change <emphasis>
only</emphasis>
 in response to keyboard or pointer activity.
</para>

<sect2 id='computing_effective_modifier_and_group'>
<title>Computing Effective Modifier and Group</title>
<para>
The effective modifiers and group
report the cumulative effects of the base, latched and locked modifiers and
group respectively, and cannot be directly changed. Note that the effective
modifiers and effective group are computed differently.
</para>

<para>
The effective modifiers are simply the bitwise union of the base, latched and
locked modifiers.
</para>


<para>
The effective group is the arithmetic sum of the base, latched and locked
groups. The locked and effective keyboard group must fall in the range
<emphasis>
Group1</emphasis>
-<emphasis>
Group4</emphasis>
, so they are adjusted into range as specified by the global <emphasis>
GroupsWrap </emphasis>
control as follows:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
  <listitem>
    <para>
If the <emphasis>
RedirectIntoRange</emphasis>
 flag is set, the four least significant
bits of the groups wrap control specify the index of a group to which all
illegal groups correspond. If the specified group is also out of range, all
illegal groups map to <emphasis>
Group1</emphasis>.
    </para>
  </listitem>
  <listitem>
    <para>
If the <emphasis>
ClampIntoRange</emphasis>
 flag is set, out-of-range groups
correspond to the nearest legal group. Effective groups larger than the highest
supported group are mapped to the highest supported group; effective groups
less than <emphasis>
Group1</emphasis>
 are mapped to <emphasis>
Group1</emphasis>
. For example, a key with two groups of symbols uses <emphasis>
Group2</emphasis>
 type and symbols if the global effective group is either <emphasis>
Group3</emphasis>
 or <emphasis>
Group4</emphasis>.
    </para>
  </listitem>
  <listitem>
    <para>
If neither flag is set, group is
wrapped into range using integer modulus. For example, a key with two groups of
symbols for which groups wrap uses <emphasis>
Group1</emphasis>
 symbols if the global effective group is <emphasis>
Group3</emphasis>
 or <emphasis>
Group2</emphasis>
 symbols if the global effective group is <emphasis>
Group4</emphasis>.
    </para>
  </listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
The base and latched keyboard groups are unrestricted eight-bit integer values
and are not affected by the <emphasis>
GroupsWrap</emphasis>
 control.
</para>

</sect2>

<sect2 id='computing_a_state_field_from_an_xkb_state'>
<title>Computing A State Field from an XKB State</title>
<para>
Many events report the keyboard state
in a single <emphasis>
state</emphasis>
 field. Using XKB, a state field combines modifiers, group and the pointer
button state into a single sixteen bit value as follows:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
  <para>Bits 0 through 7 (the least significant eight bits) of the effective
state comprise a mask of type KEYMASK which reports the state modifiers.
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>Bits 8 through 12 comprise a mask of type BUTMASK which reports pointer
button state.
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>Bits 13 and 14 are interpreted as a two-bit unsigned numeric value and
report the state keyboard group.
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>Bit 15 (the most significant bit) is reserved and must be zero.
  </para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
It is possible to assemble a state field from any of the components of the XKB
keyboard state. For example, the effective keyboard state would be assembled as
described above using the effective keyboard group, the effective keyboard
modifiers and the pointer button state.
</para>

</sect2>
</sect1>

<sect1 id='derived_components_of_xkb_keyboard_state'>
<title>Derived Components of XKB Keyboard State</title>
<para>
In addition to the fundamental state
components, XKB keeps track of and reports a number of state components which
are derived from the fundamental components but stored and reported separately
to make it easier to track changes in the keyboard state. These derived
components are updated automatically whenever any of the fundamental components
change but cannot be changed directly.
</para>

<para>
The first pair of derived state components control the way that passive grabs
are activated and the way that modifiers are reported in core protocol events
that report state. The server uses the <emphasis>
ServerInternalModifiers</emphasis>
, <emphasis>
IgnoreLocksModifiers</emphasis>
 and <emphasis>
IgnoreGroupLock</emphasis>
 controls, described in <ulink url="XKBproto.htm#50332257_45660">See Server
Internal Modifiers and Ignore Locks Behavior</ulink>, to derive these two
states as follows:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
  <para>The lookup state is the state used to determine the symbols associated
with a key event and consists of the effective state minus any server internal
modifiers.
  </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
  <para>The grab state is the state used to decide whether a particular event
triggers a passive grab and consists of the lookup state minus any members of
the ignore locks modifiers that are not either latched or logically depressed.
If the ignore group locks control is set, the grab state does not include the
effects of any locked groups.
  </para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<sect2 id='server_internal_modifiers_and_ignore_locks_behavior'>
<title>Server Internal Modifiers and Ignore Locks Behavior</title>
<para>
The core protocol does not provide any
way to exclude certain modifiers from client events, so there is no way to set
up a modifier which affects only the server.
</para>

<para>
The modifiers specified in the mask of the <emphasis>
InternalMods</emphasis>
 control are not reported in any core
protocol events, are not used to determine grabs and are not used to calculate
compatibility state for XKB-unaware clients. Server internal modifiers affect
only the action applied when a key is pressed.
</para>


<para>
The core protocol does not provide any way to exclude certain modifiers from
grab calculations, so locking modifiers often have unanticipated and
unfortunate side-effects. XKB provides another mask which can help avoid some
of these problems.
</para>


<para>
The locked state of the modifiers specified in mask of the <emphasis>
IgnoreLockMods</emphasis>
 control is not reported in most core
protocol events and is not used to activate grabs. The only core events which
include the locked state of the modifiers in the ignore locks mask are key
press and release events that do not activate a passive grab and which do not
occur while a grab is active. If the <emphasis>
IgnoreGroupLock</emphasis>
 control is set, the locked state of the
keyboard group is not considered when activating passive grabs.
</para>


<para>
Without XKB, the passive grab set by a translation (e.g. <emphasis>
Alt&lt;KeyPress&gt;space</emphasis>
) does not trigger if any modifiers other than those specified by the
translation are set, with the result that many user interface components do not
react when either Num Lock or when the secondary keyboard group are active. The
ignore locks mask and the ignore group locks control make it possible to avoid
this behavior without exhaustively grabbing every possible modifier combination.
</para>


</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id='compatibility_components_of_keyboard_state'>
<title>Compatibility Components of Keyboard State</title>
<para>
The core protocol interpretation of
keyboard modifiers does not include direct support for multiple groups, so XKB
reports the effective keyboard group to XKB-aware clients using some of the
reserved bits in the state field of some core protocol events, as described in
<ulink url="XKBproto.htm#50332257_90933">See Computing A State Field from an
XKB State</ulink>.
</para>

<para>
This modified state field would not be interpreted correctly by XKB-unaware
clients, so XKB provides a <emphasis>
group compatibility mapping</emphasis>
(see <ulink
url="XKBproto.htm#50332257_40656">See Group Compatibility Map</ulink>) which
remaps the keyboard group into a core modifier mask that has similar effects,
when possible. XKB maintains three compatibility state components that are used
to make non-XKB clients work as well as possible:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
  <listitem>
    <para>
The <emphasis>
compatibility state</emphasis>
 corresponds to the effective modifier
and effective group state.
    </para>
  </listitem>
  <listitem>
    <para>
The <emphasis>
compatibility lookup state</emphasis>
 is the core-protocol equivalent of the
lookup state.
    </para>
  </listitem>
  <listitem>
    <para>
The <emphasis>
compatibility grab state</emphasis>
 is the nearest core-protocol equivalent
of the grab state.
    </para>
  </listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Compatibility states are essentially the corresponding XKB state, but with
keyboard group possibly encoded as one or more modifiers; <ulink
url="XKBproto.htm#50332257_40656">See Group Compatibility Map</ulink> describes
the group compatibility map, which specifies the modifier(s) that correspond to
each keyboard group.
</para>


<para>
The compatibility state reported to XKB-unaware
 clients for any given core protocol event
is computed from the modifier state that XKB-capable clients would see for that
same event. For example, if the ignore group locks control is set and group 2
is locked, the modifier bound to <emphasis>
Mode_switch</emphasis>
 is not reported in any event except (Device)KeyPress and (Device)KeyRelease
events that do not trigger a passive grab.
</para>

<note>
<para>
Referring to clients as "XKB-capable
 is somewhat misleading in this context.
The sample implementation of XKB invisibly extends the X library to use the
keyboard extension if it is present. This means that most clients can take
advantage of all of XKB without modification, but it also means that the XKB
state can be reported to clients that have not explicitly requested the
keyboard extension. Clients that <emphasis>
directly</emphasis>
 interpret the state field of core protocol events or that interpret the keymap
directly may be affected by some of the XKB differences; clients that use
library or toolkit routines to interpret keyboard events automatically use all
of the XKB features.
</para>
</note>

<para>
XKB-aware clients can query the keyboard state at any time or request immediate
notification of a change to any of the fundamental or derived components of the
keyboard state.
</para>
</sect1>
</chapter>