glsl: always call do_lower_jumps() after loop unrolling

This fixes a bug in radeonsi where LLVM cannot handle the case where
a break exists but its not the last instruction in the block.

LLVM would fail with:
Terminator found in the middle of a basic block!
LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted!

Fixes: 96fe8834f539 "glsl_to_tgsi: do fewer optimizations with GLSLOptimizeConservatively"

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105317
(cherry picked from commit b42633db8e3711e54a5bd10495b1436b8e362801)

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser_extras.cpp b/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser_extras.cpp
index 59821732b98..98e4b64747b 100644
--- a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser_extras.cpp
+++ b/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser_extras.cpp
@@ -2239,6 +2239,24 @@ do_common_optimization(exec_list *ir, bool linked,
             loop_progress = false;
             loop_progress |= do_constant_propagation(ir);
             loop_progress |= do_if_simplification(ir);
+
+            /* Some drivers only call do_common_optimization() once rather
+             * than in a loop. So we must call do_lower_jumps() after
+             * unrolling a loop because for drivers that use LLVM validation
+             * will fail if a jump is not the last instruction in the block.
+             * For example the following will fail LLVM validation:
+             *
+             *   (loop (
+             *      ...
+             *   break
+             *   (assign  (x) (var_ref v124)  (expression int + (var_ref v124)
+             *      (constant int (1)) ) )
+             *   ))
+             */
+            loop_progress |= do_lower_jumps(ir, true, true,
+                                            options->EmitNoMainReturn,
+                                            options->EmitNoCont,
+                                            options->EmitNoLoops);
          }
          progress |= loop_progress;
       }