summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/writerfilter/source/rtftok
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>2020-10-12 21:04:36 +0200
committerMiklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>2020-10-13 09:02:17 +0200
commit3ee3ae85de3a29ebfb89e75960b65417bfd6ca55 (patch)
treed8bcc80544393216c1b6da6a2d8d07465de8df85 /writerfilter/source/rtftok
parent4f8b13267559e8e89a306a6c522f905322396bd0 (diff)
tdf#137180 RTF import: fix bad left margin with direct format/para style/num
This is a case when a left margin appears as direct formatting on a paragraph, the paragraph has a style and the style has the same left margin. But the paragraph has a numbering as well: so it's not valid to deduplicate the left margin from the direct formatting, because then the left margin from the numbering will be used, which can be a different value. Change-Id: I5e27502b8d505bdfddfdc910858f62e501db35a5 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/104220 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'writerfilter/source/rtftok')
-rw-r--r--writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx2
-rw-r--r--writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.cxx25
-rw-r--r--writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.hxx5
3 files changed, 20 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx
index bbcec8792bc1..02aa834c38ef 100644
--- a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx
+++ b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ RTFDocumentImpl::getProperties(const RTFSprms& rAttributes, RTFSprms const& rSpr
}
// Get rid of direct formatting what is already in the style.
- RTFSprms const sprms(aSprms.cloneAndDeduplicate(aStyleSprms, nStyleType, true));
+ RTFSprms const sprms(aSprms.cloneAndDeduplicate(aStyleSprms, nStyleType, true, &aSprms));
RTFSprms const attributes(
rAttributes.cloneAndDeduplicate(aStyleAttributes, nStyleType, true));
return new RTFReferenceProperties(attributes, sprms);
diff --git a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.cxx b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.cxx
index d281187277de..8c54fe95e345 100644
--- a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.cxx
+++ b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.cxx
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static RTFValue::Pointer_t getDefaultSPRM(Id const id, Id nStyleType)
}
/// Is it problematic to deduplicate this SPRM?
-static bool isSPRMDeduplicateDenylist(Id nId)
+static bool isSPRMDeduplicateDenylist(Id nId, RTFSprms* pDirect)
{
switch (nId)
{
@@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ static bool isSPRMDeduplicateDenylist(Id nId)
case NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Border_themeTint:
case NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Border_themeColor:
return true;
+ // Removing \fi and \li if the style has the same value would mean taking these values from
+ // \ls, while deduplication would be done to take the values from the style.
+ case NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Ind_firstLine:
+ case NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Ind_left:
+ return pDirect && pDirect->find(NS_ooxml::LN_CT_PPrBase_numPr);
default:
return false;
@@ -252,22 +257,24 @@ static bool isSPRMChildrenExpected(Id nId)
/// Does the clone / deduplication of a single sprm.
static void cloneAndDeduplicateSprm(std::pair<Id, RTFValue::Pointer_t> const& rSprm, RTFSprms& ret,
- Id nStyleType)
+ Id nStyleType, RTFSprms* pDirect = nullptr)
{
RTFValue::Pointer_t const pValue(ret.find(rSprm.first));
if (pValue)
{
if (rSprm.second->equals(*pValue))
{
- if (!isSPRMDeduplicateDenylist(rSprm.first))
+ if (!isSPRMDeduplicateDenylist(rSprm.first, pDirect))
+ {
ret.erase(rSprm.first); // duplicate to style
+ }
}
else if (!rSprm.second->getSprms().empty() || !rSprm.second->getAttributes().empty())
{
- RTFSprms const sprms(
- pValue->getSprms().cloneAndDeduplicate(rSprm.second->getSprms(), nStyleType));
+ RTFSprms const sprms(pValue->getSprms().cloneAndDeduplicate(
+ rSprm.second->getSprms(), nStyleType, /*bImplicitPPr =*/false, pDirect));
RTFSprms const attributes(pValue->getAttributes().cloneAndDeduplicate(
- rSprm.second->getAttributes(), nStyleType));
+ rSprm.second->getAttributes(), nStyleType, /*bImplicitPPr =*/false, pDirect));
// Don't copy the sprm in case we expect it to have children but it doesn't have some.
if (!isSPRMChildrenExpected(rSprm.first) || !sprms.empty() || !attributes.empty())
ret.set(rSprm.first,
@@ -377,7 +384,7 @@ void RTFSprms::duplicateList(const RTFValue::Pointer_t& pAbstract)
}
RTFSprms RTFSprms::cloneAndDeduplicate(RTFSprms& rReference, Id const nStyleType,
- bool const bImplicitPPr) const
+ bool const bImplicitPPr, RTFSprms* pDirect) const
{
RTFSprms ret(*this);
ret.ensureCopyBeforeWrite();
@@ -393,10 +400,10 @@ RTFSprms RTFSprms::cloneAndDeduplicate(RTFSprms& rReference, Id const nStyleType
if (bImplicitPPr && rSprm.first == NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Style_pPr)
{
for (const auto& i : rSprm.second->getSprms())
- cloneAndDeduplicateSprm(i, ret, nStyleType);
+ cloneAndDeduplicateSprm(i, ret, nStyleType, pDirect);
}
else
- cloneAndDeduplicateSprm(rSprm, ret, nStyleType);
+ cloneAndDeduplicateSprm(rSprm, ret, nStyleType, pDirect);
}
return ret;
}
diff --git a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.hxx b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.hxx
index 1b489fcd5864..a84e57642c0f 100644
--- a/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.hxx
+++ b/writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfsprm.hxx
@@ -61,8 +61,9 @@ public:
/// Also insert default values to override attributes of style
/// (yes, really; that's what Word does).
/// @param bImplicitPPr implicit dereference of top-level pPr SPRM
- RTFSprms cloneAndDeduplicate(RTFSprms& rReference, Id nStyleType,
- bool bImplicitPPr = false) const;
+ /// @param pDirect pointer to the root of the direct formatting SPRM tree, if any
+ RTFSprms cloneAndDeduplicate(RTFSprms& rReference, Id nStyleType, bool bImplicitPPr = false,
+ RTFSprms* pDirect = nullptr) const;
/// Inserts default values to override attributes of pAbstract.
void duplicateList(const RTFValue::Pointer_t& pAbstract);
/// Removes duplicated values based on in-list properties.