sw: return SwXFieldmark in SwXFieldEnumeration

* Implement text::XTextField in SwXFieldmark
* That requires overriding XTextContent, just forward to SwXBookmark
* Also override XServiceInfo implementation in SwXFieldmark
* Add a PropertySetInfo for SwXFieldmark, which doesn't support "Hidden"
  or "Condition" properties of SwXBookmark
* in SwXFieldmark::setFieldType(), only allow sensible new types
* fix DomainMapper_Impl assumptions that if it implements XTextField
  it can't be a fieldmark, which caused CppunitTest_sw_ooxmlexport10
  testTdf92157 to fail with a SAXException caused by some disposed
  SwXTextCursor

Change-Id: I1ae2e9cb99ea784040874517e4d1af7e59d24405
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/105083
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sw/source/core/unocore/unomap.cxx b/sw/source/core/unocore/unomap.cxx
index a609da4d53d9..0ae02dedefed 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/unocore/unomap.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/unocore/unomap.cxx
@@ -560,6 +560,17 @@ const SfxItemPropertyMapEntry* SwUnoPropertyMapProvider::GetPropertyMapEntries(s
                 m_aMapEntriesArr[nPropertyId] = GetBookmarkPropertyMap();
             }
             break;
+            case PROPERTY_MAP_FIELDMARK:
+            {
+                static SfxItemPropertyMapEntry const aFieldmarkMap_Impl[] =
+                {
+                    // FIXME: is this supposed to actually exist as UNO property, or is it supposed to be in the "parameters" of the field?
+                    { u"Checked", 0, cppu::UnoType<bool>::get(), PROPERTY_NONE,     0},
+                    { u"", 0, css::uno::Type(), 0, 0 }
+                };
+                m_aMapEntriesArr[nPropertyId] = aFieldmarkMap_Impl;
+            }
+            break;
             case PROPERTY_MAP_PARAGRAPH_EXTENSIONS:
             {
                 m_aMapEntriesArr[nPropertyId] = GetParagraphExtensionsPropertyMap();