diff options
| author | Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de> | 2023-06-13 17:15:07 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de> | 2023-06-16 16:22:22 +0200 |
| commit | 29f5742bc8ff36741baac5b71082b3daee70ac18 (patch) | |
| tree | 40ddfdeae899a9893b8d09a901e779500c6d3ec3 /i18npool | |
| parent | 60086685c91dd5d356b492b34dac613a06639b3c (diff) | |
tdf#125154 i18npool,sw: fix group separators in numbers in formulas
Commit 776f7e7463de3e97f3056712ee567f49a314829d changed cclass_Unicode
to reject group separators in numbers by default, but users are
complaining that the neat "5.000" numbers in their existing documents
are now considered invalid.
* in SwCalc, use GROUP_SEPARATOR_IN_NUMBER
* in cclass_Unicode::parseText(), reject a group separator if it is not
followed by at least 3 digits
With this, a number from tdf#42518 "0.19" is still considered invalid,
while "5.000" is now valid again.
Change-Id: If86f2ed4c27be16f866d7f4cee00789344e9ee2e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/153047
Tested-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'i18npool')
| -rw-r--r-- | i18npool/source/characterclassification/cclass_unicode_parser.cxx | 10 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/i18npool/source/characterclassification/cclass_unicode_parser.cxx b/i18npool/source/characterclassification/cclass_unicode_parser.cxx index aed29ea1ce5b..9ed95e2f907a 100644 --- a/i18npool/source/characterclassification/cclass_unicode_parser.cxx +++ b/i18npool/source/characterclassification/cclass_unicode_parser.cxx @@ -827,8 +827,16 @@ void cclass_Unicode::parseText( ParseResult& r, const OUString& rText, sal_Int32 { if (current == cGroupSep) { - if (getFlags(nextChar, eState) & ParserFlags::VALUE_DIGIT) + // accept only if it is followed by 3 digits + sal_Int32 tempIndex(index); + sal_uInt32 const nextChar2((tempIndex < rText.getLength()) ? rText.iterateCodePoints(&tempIndex) : 0); + sal_uInt32 const nextChar3((tempIndex < rText.getLength()) ? rText.iterateCodePoints(&tempIndex) : 0); + if (getFlags(nextChar, eState) & ParserFlags::VALUE_DIGIT + && getFlags(nextChar2, eState) & ParserFlags::VALUE_DIGIT + && getFlags(nextChar3, eState) & ParserFlags::VALUE_DIGIT) + { nParseTokensType |= KParseTokens::GROUP_SEPARATOR_IN_NUMBER; + } else { // Trailing group separator character is not a |