summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>2016-07-10 00:35:15 +0000
committerDavide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>2016-07-10 00:35:15 +0000
commit4c6356e8c64e246972f760a1f05bc0f365b090ad (patch)
treefbb6a4031ff3b4fe9730bbc6b8b6cd0d155bb6b2
parent58bb5a7595fc1aabc76321336f709dfee7aab583 (diff)
[SCCP] Rename undefined -> unknown.
In the solver, isUndefined() does really mean "we don't know the value yet" rather than "this is an UndefinedValue". Discussed with Eli Friedman. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22192 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp80
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
index 8d8f51ce66f..4eefc919021 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ namespace {
///
class LatticeVal {
enum LatticeValueTy {
- /// undefined - This LLVM Value has no known value yet.
- undefined,
+ /// unknown - This LLVM Value has no known value yet.
+ unknown,
/// constant - This LLVM Value has a specific constant value.
constant,
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ class LatticeVal {
}
public:
- LatticeVal() : Val(nullptr, undefined) {}
+ LatticeVal() : Val(nullptr, unknown) {}
- bool isUndefined() const { return getLatticeValue() == undefined; }
+ bool isUnknown() const { return getLatticeValue() == unknown; }
bool isConstant() const {
return getLatticeValue() == constant || getLatticeValue() == forcedconstant;
}
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ public:
return false;
}
- if (isUndefined()) {
+ if (isUnknown()) {
Val.setInt(constant);
assert(V && "Marking constant with NULL");
Val.setPointer(V);
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ public:
}
void markForcedConstant(Constant *V) {
- assert(isUndefined() && "Can't force a defined value!");
+ assert(isUnknown() && "Can't force a defined value!");
Val.setInt(forcedconstant);
Val.setPointer(V);
}
@@ -350,11 +350,11 @@ private:
}
void mergeInValue(LatticeVal &IV, Value *V, LatticeVal MergeWithV) {
- if (IV.isOverdefined() || MergeWithV.isUndefined())
+ if (IV.isOverdefined() || MergeWithV.isUnknown())
return; // Noop.
if (MergeWithV.isOverdefined())
markOverdefined(IV, V);
- else if (IV.isUndefined())
+ else if (IV.isUnknown())
markConstant(IV, V, MergeWithV.getConstant());
else if (IV.getConstant() != MergeWithV.getConstant())
markOverdefined(IV, V);
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ private:
return LV; // Common case, already in the map.
if (Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(V)) {
- // Undef values remain undefined.
+ // Undef values remain unknown.
if (!isa<UndefValue>(V))
LV.markConstant(C); // Constants are constant
}
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ private:
if (!Elt)
LV.markOverdefined(); // Unknown sort of constant.
else if (isa<UndefValue>(Elt))
- ; // Undef values remain undefined.
+ ; // Undef values remain unknown.
else
LV.markConstant(Elt); // Constants are constant.
}
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::getFeasibleSuccessors(TerminatorInst &TI,
if (!CI) {
// Overdefined condition variables, and branches on unfoldable constant
// conditions, mean the branch could go either way.
- if (!BCValue.isUndefined())
+ if (!BCValue.isUnknown())
Succs[0] = Succs[1] = true;
return;
}
@@ -563,9 +563,9 @@ void SCCPSolver::getFeasibleSuccessors(TerminatorInst &TI,
LatticeVal SCValue = getValueState(SI->getCondition());
ConstantInt *CI = SCValue.getConstantInt();
- if (!CI) { // Overdefined or undefined condition?
+ if (!CI) { // Overdefined or unknown condition?
// All destinations are executable!
- if (!SCValue.isUndefined())
+ if (!SCValue.isUnknown())
Succs.assign(TI.getNumSuccessors(), true);
return;
}
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::isEdgeFeasible(BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To) {
// undef conditions mean that neither edge is feasible yet.
ConstantInt *CI = BCValue.getConstantInt();
if (!CI)
- return !BCValue.isUndefined();
+ return !BCValue.isUnknown();
// Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way.
return BI->getSuccessor(CI->isZero()) == To;
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::isEdgeFeasible(BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To) {
ConstantInt *CI = SCValue.getConstantInt();
if (!CI)
- return !SCValue.isUndefined();
+ return !SCValue.isUnknown();
return SI->findCaseValue(CI).getCaseSuccessor() == To;
}
@@ -679,12 +679,12 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
// are overdefined, the PHI becomes overdefined as well. If they are all
// constant, and they agree with each other, the PHI becomes the identical
// constant. If they are constant and don't agree, the PHI is overdefined.
- // If there are no executable operands, the PHI remains undefined.
+ // If there are no executable operands, the PHI remains unknown.
//
Constant *OperandVal = nullptr;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN.getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
LatticeVal IV = getValueState(PN.getIncomingValue(i));
- if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node.
+ if (IV.isUnknown()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node.
if (!isEdgeFeasible(PN.getIncomingBlock(i), PN.getParent()))
continue;
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitPHINode(PHINode &PN) {
// If we exited the loop, this means that the PHI node only has constant
// arguments that agree with each other(and OperandVal is the constant) or
// OperandVal is null because there are no defined incoming arguments. If
- // this is the case, the PHI remains undefined.
+ // this is the case, the PHI remains unknown.
//
if (OperandVal)
markConstant(&PN, OperandVal); // Acquire operand value
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &I) {
return markAnythingOverdefined(&I);
LatticeVal CondValue = getValueState(I.getCondition());
- if (CondValue.isUndefined())
+ if (CondValue.isUnknown())
return;
if (ConstantInt *CondCB = CondValue.getConstantInt()) {
@@ -853,9 +853,9 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &I) {
TVal.getConstant() == FVal.getConstant())
return markConstant(&I, FVal.getConstant());
- if (TVal.isUndefined()) // select ?, undef, X -> X.
+ if (TVal.isUnknown()) // select ?, undef, X -> X.
return mergeInValue(&I, FVal);
- if (FVal.isUndefined()) // select ?, X, undef -> X.
+ if (FVal.isUnknown()) // select ?, X, undef -> X.
return mergeInValue(&I, TVal);
markOverdefined(&I);
}
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitBinaryOperator(Instruction &I) {
NonOverdefVal = &V2State;
if (NonOverdefVal) {
- if (NonOverdefVal->isUndefined()) {
+ if (NonOverdefVal->isUnknown()) {
// Could annihilate value.
if (I.getOpcode() == Instruction::And)
markConstant(IV, &I, Constant::getNullValue(I.getType()));
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitCmpInst(CmpInst &I) {
return markConstant(IV, &I, C);
}
- // If operands are still undefined, wait for it to resolve.
+ // If operands are still unknown, wait for it to resolve.
if (!V1State.isOverdefined() && !V2State.isOverdefined())
return;
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &I) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I.getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
LatticeVal State = getValueState(I.getOperand(i));
- if (State.isUndefined())
+ if (State.isUnknown())
return; // Operands are not resolved yet.
if (State.isOverdefined())
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ void SCCPSolver::visitLoadInst(LoadInst &I) {
return markAnythingOverdefined(&I);
LatticeVal PtrVal = getValueState(I.getOperand(0));
- if (PtrVal.isUndefined()) return; // The pointer is not resolved yet!
+ if (PtrVal.isUnknown()) return; // The pointer is not resolved yet!
LatticeVal &IV = ValueState[&I];
if (IV.isOverdefined()) return;
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ CallOverdefined:
AI != E; ++AI) {
LatticeVal State = getValueState(*AI);
- if (State.isUndefined())
+ if (State.isUnknown())
return; // Operands are not resolved yet.
if (State.isOverdefined())
return markOverdefined(I);
@@ -1252,14 +1252,14 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
// more precise than this but it isn't worth bothering.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = STy->getNumElements(); i != e; ++i) {
LatticeVal &LV = getStructValueState(&I, i);
- if (LV.isUndefined())
+ if (LV.isUnknown())
markOverdefined(LV, &I);
}
continue;
}
LatticeVal &LV = getValueState(&I);
- if (!LV.isUndefined()) continue;
+ if (!LV.isUnknown()) continue;
// extractvalue is safe; check here because the argument is a struct.
if (isa<ExtractValueInst>(I))
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::FDiv:
case Instruction::FRem:
// Floating-point binary operation: be conservative.
- if (Op0LV.isUndefined() && Op1LV.isUndefined())
+ if (Op0LV.isUnknown() && Op1LV.isUnknown())
markForcedConstant(&I, Constant::getNullValue(ITy));
else
markOverdefined(&I);
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::Mul:
case Instruction::And:
// Both operands undef -> undef
- if (Op0LV.isUndefined() && Op1LV.isUndefined())
+ if (Op0LV.isUnknown() && Op1LV.isUnknown())
break;
// undef * X -> 0. X could be zero.
// undef & X -> 0. X could be zero.
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::Or:
// Both operands undef -> undef
- if (Op0LV.isUndefined() && Op1LV.isUndefined())
+ if (Op0LV.isUnknown() && Op1LV.isUnknown())
break;
// undef | X -> -1. X could be -1.
markForcedConstant(&I, Constant::getAllOnesValue(ITy));
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
// undef ^ undef -> 0; strictly speaking, this is not strictly
// necessary, but we try to be nice to people who expect this
// behavior in simple cases
- if (Op0LV.isUndefined() && Op1LV.isUndefined()) {
+ if (Op0LV.isUnknown() && Op1LV.isUnknown()) {
markForcedConstant(&I, Constant::getNullValue(ITy));
return true;
}
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::URem:
// X / undef -> undef. No change.
// X % undef -> undef. No change.
- if (Op1LV.isUndefined()) break;
+ if (Op1LV.isUnknown()) break;
// X / 0 -> undef. No change.
// X % 0 -> undef. No change.
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::AShr:
// X >>a undef -> undef.
- if (Op1LV.isUndefined()) break;
+ if (Op1LV.isUnknown()) break;
// Shifting by the bitwidth or more is undefined.
if (Op1LV.isConstant()) {
@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::Shl:
// X << undef -> undef.
// X >> undef -> undef.
- if (Op1LV.isUndefined()) break;
+ if (Op1LV.isUnknown()) break;
// Shifting by the bitwidth or more is undefined.
if (Op1LV.isConstant()) {
@@ -1398,13 +1398,13 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
case Instruction::Select:
Op1LV = getValueState(I.getOperand(1));
// undef ? X : Y -> X or Y. There could be commonality between X/Y.
- if (Op0LV.isUndefined()) {
+ if (Op0LV.isUnknown()) {
if (!Op1LV.isConstant()) // Pick the constant one if there is any.
Op1LV = getValueState(I.getOperand(2));
- } else if (Op1LV.isUndefined()) {
+ } else if (Op1LV.isUnknown()) {
// c ? undef : undef -> undef. No change.
Op1LV = getValueState(I.getOperand(2));
- if (Op1LV.isUndefined())
+ if (Op1LV.isUnknown())
break;
// Otherwise, c ? undef : x -> x.
} else {
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
TerminatorInst *TI = BB.getTerminator();
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(TI)) {
if (!BI->isConditional()) continue;
- if (!getValueState(BI->getCondition()).isUndefined())
+ if (!getValueState(BI->getCondition()).isUnknown())
continue;
// If the input to SCCP is actually branch on undef, fix the undef to
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ bool SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn(Function &F) {
if (SwitchInst *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(TI)) {
if (!SI->getNumCases())
continue;
- if (!getValueState(SI->getCondition()).isUndefined())
+ if (!getValueState(SI->getCondition()).isUnknown())
continue;
// If the input to SCCP is actually switch on undef, fix the undef to