mm/hmm: remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout

The wait_event_timeout macro already tests the condition as its first
action, so there is no reason to open code another version of this, all
that does is skip the might_sleep() debugging in common cases, which is
not helpful.

Further, based on prior patches, we can no simplify the required condition
test:
 - If range is valid memory then so is range->hmm
 - If hmm_release() has run then range->valid is set to false
   at the same time as dead, so no reason to check both.
 - A valid hmm has a valid hmm->mm.

Also, add the READ_ONCE for range->valid as there is no lock held here.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 1110fdf11f79..660bb2aa9829 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -218,17 +218,9 @@ static inline unsigned long hmm_range_page_size(const struct hmm_range *range)
 static inline bool hmm_range_wait_until_valid(struct hmm_range *range,
 					      unsigned long timeout)
 {
-	/* Check if mm is dead ? */
-	if (range->hmm == NULL || range->hmm->dead || range->hmm->mm == NULL) {
-		range->valid = false;
-		return false;
-	}
-	if (range->valid)
-		return true;
-	wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid || range->hmm->dead,
+	wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid,
 			   msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
-	/* Return current valid status just in case we get lucky */
-	return range->valid;
+	return READ_ONCE(range->valid);
 }
 
 /*