summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/BoardOfDirectors/IrcLogs/2013/08-08.mdwn
blob: f01fe7947ec44633d4ae5d21dacd99e8c4fe213b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214

Date is 2013-08-09, times are UTC+10.  
[[!format txt """
--- Day changed Fri Aug 09 2013
07:05 < whot_> agenda for today: XDC paper reviews, GSoC updates, XDC misc. anyone have anything else?
07:05 < stukreit> yes, $$ and legal
07:05 < mupuf_> whot_: don't forget travel sponsoring
07:06 <+alanc> I assume XDC travel sponsoring falls into one of those
07:06 < whot_> oh, and after I read through the bylaws again this week: I'm supposed to send out the agenda before the meeting, do you want me to do this or rather not?
07:06 <+emmes> don't bother
07:06 <+alanc> someday we need to fix our bylaws to match reality
07:07 < mupuf_> whot_: don't bother
07:08 < whot_> ok. let's get started then. mupuf_ - XDC paper reviews?
07:08 < mupuf_> sure, so we got 10 proposals, all of them have been accepted
07:08 < mupuf_> Here is a complete list: http://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2013/Program/*
07:09 < mupuf_> I'll send a mail to everyone to notify them
07:09 < stukreit> this is really great, guys!
07:09 < whot_> nice
07:09 < marcoz_> cool
07:09 <+alanc> URL works better without the * on the end
07:09 < mupuf_> we have a more detailled review in private, but we can make it public
07:09 < mupuf_> and some of us would like to send some comments on the proposals
07:10 < mupuf_> Appart from one or two, I find the proposals very solid
07:11 < mupuf_> Jerome's proposition is pending though, he is waiting for clearance to talk about this
07:11 < mupuf_> It seems like we'll find the same topics as last year
07:12 < mupuf_> And I'm also hopping keithp will add a talk about DRI3
07:12 < mupuf_> and kristian about wayland too
07:12 <+alanc> we did say this first deadline was for more formal talk proposals, with openings later for filling in the rest with less formalized talks
07:13 < mupuf_> indeed
07:13 < mupuf_> but having a dri3 whitepaper would be nice. Documentation has already been written, it would be a matter of putting everything together
07:14 < whot_> just nominate keithp for a talk then and see if he bails out :)
07:15 < mupuf_> Ah ah, he is also in the paper committee, so that would be weird
07:16 < mupuf_> Anyway, we basically have enough to fill one of the 3 days
07:16 <+alanc> oh, keithp is at GUADEC right now, isn't he?
07:16 <+alanc> that'd explain lack of attendance
07:16 < mupuf_> so, as usual, we should ping people left and right and ask them to give talks
07:17 <+alanc> anyways, I think this is the best collection of formal talks we've gotten submitted
07:17 < mupuf_> we can also schedule BoFs
07:17 <+alanc> don't remember ever having more than 2 or 3 before
07:17 < mupuf_> I agree, we have really solid talks in concrete projects
07:17 < mupuf_> on*
07:18 < mupuf_> As for the scheduling of the talks, we'll see later I guess
07:19 < mupuf_> and also, people submitting papers or white papers should be mandated to give a talk
07:20 <+emmes> ok, do we need a formal agreement from the board for the accepted papers? I don't think so, the agreement in the paper committee should be completely sufficient.
07:21 < whot_> i agree
07:21 <+alanc> right, I think leaving it to the paper committee is fine
07:22 < agd5f> yeah
07:22 <+emmes> anything else we need on the papers? I guess travel sponsorship is something we need to vote on in the board, because it involves foundation money.
07:23 <+alanc> right - I saw three sponsorship requests in there, which the board should vote on
07:23 <+alanc> the ones I saw were:
07:23 <+alanc> David Hermann: ~$1300
07:23 <+alanc> Matthias Hopf: ~$1000 + hotel
07:23 <+alanc> Martin Peres:  ~$1100 + hotel
07:25 < whot_> +1 from me
07:25 <+emmes> For the record: I could share my hotel room if it helps anybody who's on a tight budget
07:25 <+alanc> given the $80/night hotel room, assume $240-$320 for hotel depending on schedule
07:25 <+emmes> (or if the foundation is on a tight budget)
07:25 < stukreit> we have $68K remaining
07:26  * mupuf_ cannot really vote on this
07:26 <+alanc> so ~$4k for travel seems reasonable
07:26 <+alanc> +1 from me
07:26 < marcoz_> +1 
07:26 < stukreit> absolutely within reason
07:26 < stukreit> +1
07:26 <+emmes> +1 (except my own proposal off course)
07:27 < whot_> ok, we have a majority, vote carried
07:27 < mupuf_> +1 (except my own proposal of course)
07:27 < agd5f> +1
07:27 <+alanc> I assume you're both abstaining on your proposals, not voting against them
07:28 < whot_> I'll send out an email to david, I suspect emmes and mupuf_ won't need one I hope :)
07:28 <+emmes> sure :-P
07:28 < mupuf_> whot_: :)
07:28 <+emmes> whot_: lol
07:28 <+alanc> don't forget to bring receipts to the conference if you want Stuart to hand you a check there
07:29 <+emmes> yes, thanks for the reminder
07:29 < stukreit> Yes, Actually, scan your receipts and email to me asap, and you're off the hook
07:29 < mupuf_> stukreit: I only have only receipts, do I mail that?
07:30 < stukreit> Get a free scan app for your phone ...
07:30 < mupuf_> online*
07:30 < stukreit> fine, you're there already. email all in 1 message.
07:30 < mupuf_> great, thanks
07:31 < stukreit> I will try to do the reimbursements 100% non-paper this time.
07:31 <+emmes> awesome
07:31 < mupuf_> oh, that's sweet. Last time my bank went crazy when I showed them a check in dollars :D
07:31 < mupuf_> same happened with canadian dollars
07:31 < stukreit> I need to dig up the page detailing all info needed for wire transfers. yes, we need to stop using the physical mails
07:32 < whot_> ok, I think travel sponsorship is done? stukreit want to move on to $$?
07:32 <+emmes> you just need iban/bic, bank name and account name
07:32 < stukreit> I remember teething pains with this last year
07:33 <+emmes> ok, something to deal with later. I think we can move on.
07:33 < stukreit> ok, I've gotten into gear repairing the problem with 501(c)(3) and hsbc account.
07:33 < mupuf_> at least, you can make all the transfers together
07:33 < agd5f> stukreit: any news on setting up xorg as a vendor gsoc money?
07:33 < agd5f> *for
07:34 < stukreit> as you recall, I blew the deadline to file tax returns "form 990", partly because SFLC had no incoming mail from the IRS with warnings or info.
07:34 < stukreit> agd: I'll get to that..
07:34 < stukreit> so, I'm back in contact with sflc. We've gone through 3 changes of attorneys, and now Eben (the founder/pres) is helping us directly.
07:35 < stukreit> I'm having a concall with him tomorrow, and he sent me a tarball of all their filing info and intermediate stuff related to our 501(c)(3), so I have something to mark up and hopefully they have < 2% effort to proofread and submit
07:36 < stukreit> I managed to file a 990-N ("postcard form return") with the help of an IRS agent on the phone.
07:37 < whot_> sorry, how does the 990, the 501c3 and hsbc tie together again?
07:37 < stukreit> It failed the first time because of our ambiguous status, but I asked for explanation/help, and they worked it out.   Apparently the IRS is trying to buff their customer friendly image especially wrt 501(c)(3) apps, for well known timely reasons.
07:38 < stukreit> the 501c3 got retracted because I failed to submit 3 years of tax returns. Actually, those returns turn out to be quite simple because we have zero income, only expenses.
07:38 < stukreit> the 990 is a 2012 submission. I need to file 2011 and 2010, but haven't figured out/asked how yet.
07:38 < whot_> and hscb closed the account because of the 501c3 retraction?
07:39 < stukreit> Separately, but complicatedly, HSBC zapped our checking account. Here's what happened:
07:40 < stukreit> They have been charging us $29/month and up (depending on activity) "analysis fee".   In the past, when the checking account went neg, they've automatically pulled the amount from the savings account. I have 3 paper notifications of this happening.
07:41 < stukreit> However, in July, they decided that wasn't cool and silently waived the charge and closed the checking.  I only found out because after logging in online and being unable to get to the checking
07:41 < stukreit> (to in fact, push some money there), I went to the branch here in Palo Alto and found out all.
07:42 < stukreit> this is getting long... I will either open a new checking account/savings account from this branch in PA, or find another bank (the earlier plan was to get the hell away from hsbc).  
07:43 < stukreit> but this week I'm focused on getting materials over to sflc.
07:44 <+alanc> yeah, I thought the plan last year was to flee HSBC
07:44 < stukreit> and, does anyone have a recommended bank to go to?
07:45 <+emmes> i have no idea about american banks. here in Europe people flee if the bank charges anything at all...
07:45 < mupuf_> Well, we need to look into international banks, to ease transfers
07:45 < marcoz_> I'm a fan of credit unions, but they don't have the best returns.
07:45 < stukreit> And a question about gsoc:  Can they simply send the money to the individual participants? Has anyone talked to gsoc before?
07:46 < mupuf_> stukreit: no, they send a credit card to the student
07:46 < stukreit> um, hsbc is not American. Is it european?
07:46 < mupuf_> and the student uses it the way he wants
07:46 <+alanc> stukreit: they send money to the students and then give the sponsoring org money too
07:46 < stukreit> ok, so can you send a doc that describes what/how/when our org gets our money?
07:47 <+alanc> which we can use for mentor stipends, underwriting things like our XDC travel coverage, or just general expenses
07:47 < stukreit> (why is this new to me, i thought we did a gsoc before)  Doesn't the mentor payment go as the student payment?
07:47 < mupuf_> alanc: how much does the organization get?
07:47 <+alanc> we should have been getting $500 / student we mentored every year, but I think we always failed at paperwork
07:48 < agd5f> yeah, that's pretty much the deal
07:48 < stukreit> apologies, but I was not watching this before. Hey! maybe I'll find the old moneys.
07:48 < mupuf_> Dylan may ask for travel sponsorship, but he needs to submit a talk first
07:48 <+alanc> https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2013/help_page#1._How_do_payments_work
07:48 < stukreit> is that $500 the mentor's payment?
07:48 <+alanc> "Google will provide a total stipend of 5500 USD per accepted student developer, of which 5000 USD goes to the student and 500 USD goes to the mentoring organization."
07:49 < agd5f> also if anyone wants to go to the gsoc mentor summit, the deadline is close (google will pay for 1-2 per org)
07:49 <+alanc> we get $500. what we do with it is up to us
07:49 < stukreit> so... can someone send me a list of completed gsoc gigs, I'll see if they'll still pay up.
07:49 <+alanc> we also should have gotten reimbursements in the past for mentoring summit travel expenses for sending Bart, Donnie, etal.
07:50 < agd5f> marcheu may know about the money from previous years since he ran it last
07:50 < stukreit> alanc: are you the most knowledgable on this topic? we can get it organized after the call
07:50 <+alanc> no, agd5f or marcheu know more
07:51 <+alanc> I may still have some old mails on it
07:51 < stukreit> k. I'll ask him. But I have enough confusing stuff to learn already.
07:51 < agd5f> to get the mentor money, you have to sign up as a google supplier or use one of the 3rd party organizations
07:52 < stukreit> I talked a bit to sfconservatory, and will have a longer call with them next week.  It makes no sense for us to "use one of the 3rd party organizations"
07:52 < marcheu> agd5f: last years the money was put on the HSBC account, wherever that is
07:52 < agd5f> ok
07:53 < stukreit> because we have our own 501c3 (except not right this minute)
07:53 < marcheu> yes you should use the 501c3
07:53 <+alanc> so we should have already been signed up as a supplier last year
07:53 < marcheu> otherwise IRS will look at you closely
07:53 < stukreit> just keep in mind that  it is lapsed at the moment.  
07:53 < agd5f> yes, but marcheu used his address because xorg didn't have one
07:53 < agd5f> so we need to sign up again
07:54 < marcheu> agd5f: technically I used my name, the HSBC bank # and the SFLC's address...
07:54 < stukreit> unless someone has good info to send me, I'll have to contact gsoc and ask the stupid questions "hey, are we in your database?"
07:54 < marcheu> agd5f: since I'm a US resident, I don't want to use my name any more, because IRS
07:54 <+alanc> I thought someone sent you the form already
07:54 < stukreit> I don't feel comfortable using sflc's address anymore. 
07:54 < marcheu> however, someone who isn't a US resident wouldn't care
07:54 < agd5f> stukreit, I can forward you the info from google again on how to sign up as a supplier
07:55 < stukreit> because they have changed personnel, and have lost important warnings that would have saved us grief
07:55 < stukreit> agd5f: yes please
07:55 < marcheu> stukreit: I don't think they'll snail-mail you anything, so SFLC or not doesn't matter much
07:55 < agd5f> stukreit, done
07:56 < agd5f> stukreit, I can help sign up, I just need to know what address and bank info to use
07:57 < stukreit> we still have the savings account active, and I may just setup a new checking account to get past the next XDC
07:58  * mupuf_ thinks the american banking system is way to complicated :D
07:58 < mupuf_> too*
07:58 < stukreit> after tomorrow's talk with Eben Moglin, I'll know whether to use sflc's address
07:58 < whot_> yeah, I think we should schedule some time at xdc so you can clarify this to us non-US ppl
07:59 < stukreit> mupuf:  we're talking about hsbc. Its not an american bank
07:59 < mupuf_> stukreit: sure, but checking, saving, and the third obscure one are confusing
07:59 < stukreit> whot: yes, schedule 45 min for Board talky
07:59 < marcheu> mupuf_: not really... "compte cheques", "livret A"
08:00 < stukreit> I don't mean to imply there's a "third obscure account". there are only 2 we're interested in
08:00 <+alanc> we should have board talk to members, but can also schedule some just in-person discussion time
08:00 < mupuf_> marcheu: I see. So, all accounts are linked to the same card.... interesting
08:01 < marcheu> mupuf_: yup... you just tell the ATM where to deposit/draw from
08:01 < mupuf_> marcheu: ack, thanks
08:02 < stukreit> speaking of which, I must remember to ask hsbc which acct our ATM card is attached to..
08:02 <+alanc> hmm, I always thought of HSBC as a UK bank, but wikipedia says it was originally the "Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation" before moving to the UK
08:02 < stukreit> whiew, glad I didn't call it European ;-)
08:02 < stukreit> Their website is the product of deranged minds
08:03 < mupuf_> ok, so, can we move to the GSoC students?
08:03 < stukreit> yes, I will continue my homework on this.
08:04 < mupuf_> ok, great. Sorry whot_ for rushing things a little
08:04 < whot_> that's fine, I was just about to move things on anyway
08:04 < mupuf_> so, for the GSoC, we had 4 students
08:04 < whot_> stukreit: need you afterwards to clarify a few things for the meetings so I don't sum up something wrongly
08:04 < mupuf_> 1 of them bailed out
08:04 < mupuf_> the one on XV
08:05 < mupuf_> the others all passed
08:06 < agd5f> what was especially annoying is that he told us he wanted to quit and I asked him "are you really sure? 'cause once it's done, it's done" and he said yes
08:06 < mupuf_> I sent a mail to the board with a more detailed evaluation of each student
08:06 < agd5f> then when he saw that he failed, he asked if he could be unfailed and continue the project
08:07 < agd5f> water under a bridge
08:07 < stukreit> oh, the first part sounds very mature, the second part, whoops!
08:07 < mupuf_> agd5f: was he expecting to get money and not working?
08:07 < mupuf_> ahuillet got pissed about this student
08:09 < agd5f> mupuf_, I guess he decided he wanted to continue working on the gsoc project after he told us he wanted to drop out.
08:10 < stukreit> who is going to the mentor summit. (hint, I'd like to drop in, its close by)
08:11 < mupuf_> this is out of question for me. After the XDC, I will have crossed the pond 6 times this year
08:11 < stukreit> nice. gimme your airline miles
08:11 < agd5f> stukreit, no one has expressed interest so far
08:12  * mupuf_ should get a miles card
08:12 < marcheu> agd5f: sync up with donnie if no one does -- I think he's always interested in a spot
08:13 < agd5f> marcheu, ok
08:14 < stukreit> I guess I'll sign up then
08:15 < whot_> we're running a bit over time and the last item I had was misc XDC stuff (e.g. confirmed hotel rate) but since keithp isn't here we'll probably have to leave that out. I'll send him an email for that
08:16 < whot_> anyone got any further items?
08:18 <+alanc> not me
08:18 < stukreit> -1
08:18 < agd5f> I'm all set
08:19 <+emmes> nothing from my side
08:19 < whot_> ok, calling it closed for today. see you guys in two weeks
"""]]