/* * Copyright © 2012 Intel Corporation * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: * * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the * Software. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS * IN THE SOFTWARE. * * Authors: * Eric Anholt * */ #include "brw_cfg.h" #include "brw_vec4_live_variables.h" using namespace brw; /** @file brw_vec4_live_variables.cpp * * Support for computing at the basic block level which variables * (virtual GRFs in our case) are live at entry and exit. * * See Muchnik's Advanced Compiler Design and Implementation, section * 14.1 (p444). */ /** * Sets up the use[] and def[] arrays. * * The basic-block-level live variable analysis needs to know which * variables get used before they're completely defined, and which * variables are completely defined before they're used. * * We independently track each channel of a vec4. This is because we need to * be able to recognize a sequence like: * * ... * DP4 tmp.x a b; * DP4 tmp.y c d; * MUL result.xy tmp.xy e.xy * ... * * as having tmp live only across that sequence (assuming it's used nowhere * else), because it's a common pattern. A more conservative approach that * doesn't get tmp marked a deffed in this block will tend to result in * spilling. */ void vec4_live_variables::setup_def_use() { int ip = 0; for (int b = 0; b < cfg->num_blocks; b++) { bblock_t *block = cfg->blocks[b]; assert(ip == block->start_ip); if (b > 0) assert(cfg->blocks[b - 1]->end_ip == ip - 1); for (vec4_instruction *inst = (vec4_instruction *)block->start; inst != block->end->next; inst = (vec4_instruction *)inst->next) { /* Set use[] for this instruction */ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { if (inst->src[i].file == GRF) { int reg = inst->src[i].reg; for (int j = 0; j < 4; j++) { int c = BRW_GET_SWZ(inst->src[i].swizzle, j); if (!bd[b].def[reg * 4 + c]) bd[b].use[reg * 4 + c] = true; } } } /* Check for unconditional writes to whole registers. These * are the things that screen off preceding definitions of a * variable, and thus qualify for being in def[]. */ if (inst->dst.file == GRF && v->virtual_grf_sizes[inst->dst.reg] == 1 && !inst->predicate) { for (int c = 0; c < 4; c++) { if (inst->dst.writemask & (1 << c)) { int reg = inst->dst.reg; if (!bd[b].use[reg * 4 + c]) bd[b].def[reg * 4 + c] = true; } } } ip++; } } } /** * The algorithm incrementally sets bits in liveout and livein, * propagating it through control flow. It will eventually terminate * because it only ever adds bits, and stops when no bits are added in * a pass. */ void vec4_live_variables::compute_live_variables() { bool cont = true; while (cont) { cont = false; for (int b = 0; b < cfg->num_blocks; b++) { /* Update livein */ for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { if (bd[b].use[i] || (bd[b].liveout[i] && !bd[b].def[i])) { if (!bd[b].livein[i]) { bd[b].livein[i] = true; cont = true; } } } /* Update liveout */ foreach_list(block_node, &cfg->blocks[b]->children) { bblock_link *link = (bblock_link *)block_node; bblock_t *block = link->block; for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { if (bd[block->block_num].livein[i] && !bd[b].liveout[i]) { bd[b].liveout[i] = true; cont = true; } } } } } } vec4_live_variables::vec4_live_variables(vec4_visitor *v, cfg_t *cfg) : v(v), cfg(cfg) { mem_ctx = ralloc_context(cfg->mem_ctx); num_vars = v->virtual_grf_count * 4; bd = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, struct block_data, cfg->num_blocks); for (int i = 0; i < cfg->num_blocks; i++) { bd[i].def = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); bd[i].use = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); bd[i].livein = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); bd[i].liveout = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); } setup_def_use(); compute_live_variables(); } vec4_live_variables::~vec4_live_variables() { ralloc_free(mem_ctx); } #define MAX_INSTRUCTION (1 << 30) /** * Computes a conservative start/end of the live intervals for each virtual GRF. * * We could expose per-channel live intervals to the consumer based on the * information we computed in vec4_live_variables, except that our only * current user is virtual_grf_interferes(). So we instead union the * per-channel ranges into a per-vgrf range for virtual_grf_start[] and * virtual_grf_end[]. * * We could potentially have virtual_grf_interferes() do the test per-channel, * which would let some interesting register allocation occur (particularly on * code-generated GLSL sequences from the Cg compiler which does register * allocation at the GLSL level and thus reuses components of the variable * with distinct lifetimes). But right now the complexity of doing so doesn't * seem worth it, since having virtual_grf_interferes() be cheap is important * for register allocation performance. */ void vec4_visitor::calculate_live_intervals() { if (this->live_intervals_valid) return; int *start = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, this->virtual_grf_count); int *end = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, this->virtual_grf_count); ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_start); ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_end); this->virtual_grf_start = start; this->virtual_grf_end = end; for (int i = 0; i < this->virtual_grf_count; i++) { start[i] = MAX_INSTRUCTION; end[i] = -1; } /* Start by setting up the intervals with no knowledge of control * flow. */ int ip = 0; foreach_list(node, &this->instructions) { vec4_instruction *inst = (vec4_instruction *)node; for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { if (inst->src[i].file == GRF) { int reg = inst->src[i].reg; start[reg] = MIN2(start[reg], ip); end[reg] = ip; } } if (inst->dst.file == GRF) { int reg = inst->dst.reg; start[reg] = MIN2(start[reg], ip); end[reg] = ip; } ip++; } /* Now, extend those intervals using our analysis of control flow. * * The control flow-aware analysis was done at a channel level, while at * this point we're distilling it down to vgrfs. */ cfg_t cfg(this); vec4_live_variables livevars(this, &cfg); for (int b = 0; b < cfg.num_blocks; b++) { for (int i = 0; i < livevars.num_vars; i++) { if (livevars.bd[b].livein[i]) { start[i / 4] = MIN2(start[i / 4], cfg.blocks[b]->start_ip); end[i / 4] = MAX2(end[i / 4], cfg.blocks[b]->start_ip); } if (livevars.bd[b].liveout[i]) { start[i / 4] = MIN2(start[i / 4], cfg.blocks[b]->end_ip); end[i / 4] = MAX2(end[i / 4], cfg.blocks[b]->end_ip); } } } this->live_intervals_valid = true; } bool vec4_visitor::virtual_grf_interferes(int a, int b) { return !(virtual_grf_end[a] <= virtual_grf_start[b] || virtual_grf_end[b] <= virtual_grf_start[a]); }