From 6248fbe5e42ef2a620b4c3793af2b809fab6f169 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Samuel Pitoiset Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:13:38 +0200 Subject: radv: get rid of buffer object priorities We mostly use the same priority for all buffer objects, so I don't think that matter much. This should reduce CPU overhead a little bit. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen --- src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c') diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c index 2e1ba2c7b22..c8558216bf1 100644 --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_buffer.c @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ uint32_t radv_fill_buffer(struct radv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer, } else if (size) { uint64_t va = radv_buffer_get_va(bo); va += offset; - radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, bo, 8); + radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, bo); si_cp_dma_clear_buffer(cmd_buffer, va, size, value); } @@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ void radv_copy_buffer(struct radv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer, src_va += src_offset; dst_va += dst_offset; - radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, src_bo, 8); - radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, dst_bo, 8); + radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, src_bo); + radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, dst_bo); si_cp_dma_buffer_copy(cmd_buffer, src_va, dst_va, size); } @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ void radv_CmdUpdateBuffer( if (dataSize < RADV_BUFFER_OPS_CS_THRESHOLD) { si_emit_cache_flush(cmd_buffer); - radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, dst_buffer->bo, 8); + radv_cs_add_buffer(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, dst_buffer->bo); radeon_check_space(cmd_buffer->device->ws, cmd_buffer->cs, words + 4); -- cgit v1.2.3