CWS-TOOLING: integrate CWS dba32i

2009-11-02 08:24:27 +0100 oj  r277285 : i105959# simply logic again
2009-10-30 14:47:31 +0100 oj  r277271 : #i105959# duplicate contion row when new or criteria was found
2009-10-30 14:46:50 +0100 oj  r277270 : #i105959# replace boolean_term with search_condition and add extra ()
2009-10-28 08:12:38 +0100 oj  r277235 : #i105825# try catch in the wrong place
2009-10-27 12:15:40 +0100 fs  r277197 : compiler bug: streaming a volatile double into an Any results in a boolean-Any ... removed the 'volatile', which was nonsense, anyway
2009-10-23 22:07:54 +0200 fs  r277171 : #i103611# re-introduced the hack for transparent VCL child windows, which got lost since OOo 3.1.x (commit approved by aw)
2009-10-23 07:11:59 +0200 oj  r277131 : #i105959# handle parameter like column_ref
2009-10-22 14:57:55 +0200 fs  r277124 : #i10000# wrongly resolved the merge conflict, corrected now
2009-10-22 13:53:23 +0200 oj  r277118 : #i105959# change config when doc location has changed
2009-10-22 11:31:22 +0200 oj  r277111 : #i106072# attachprovider at the end of doc
2009-10-22 09:12:47 +0200 fs  r277102 : CWS-TOOLING: rebase CWS dba32i to branches/OOO320@276942 (milestone: OOO320:m2)
2009-10-21 21:13:02 +0200 fs  r277101 : module 'data' does not exist anymore (for a long time by now), so now need to list it here
2009-10-21 13:35:35 +0200 fs  r277089 : #i105992#
2009-10-21 13:17:51 +0200 fs  r277088 : reintroduced the fix for issue #i102090#, which got lost since 3.1.1, during one of the many merges/changes
2009-10-21 13:06:55 +0200 fs  r277085 : #i105992# position the control in isPrimitiveVisible, not in get2DDecomposition. The latter might not be called in some situations, the former (hopefully) always is
2009-10-20 07:35:27 +0200 oj  r277036 : #i106041# check the dispatch in impl_select not before
2009-10-13 08:40:52 +0200 oj  r276843 : #i105825# throw exception when database was written by newer version
2009-10-12 14:32:19 +0200 oj  r276834 : #i105724# check tDisplayCondition
2009-10-12 13:24:28 +0200 fs  r276829 : #i105806# getPropertyValue: throw an UnknownPropertyException for, well, unknown properties
2009-10-12 10:46:27 +0200 fs  r276821 : since tags
2009-10-09 10:51:29 +0200 fs  r276800 : #i105712# re-introduce XUnoTunnel
2009-10-09 10:46:48 +0200 oj  r276799 : #i105716# end chars with 0

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/xmloff/source/forms/gridcolumnproptranslator.cxx b/xmloff/source/forms/gridcolumnproptranslator.cxx
index ae8975bc20..d5e647f4b2 100644
--- a/xmloff/source/forms/gridcolumnproptranslator.cxx
+++ b/xmloff/source/forms/gridcolumnproptranslator.cxx
@@ -235,9 +235,15 @@ namespace xmloff
     }
     
     //--------------------------------------------------------------------
-    void SAL_CALL OGridColumnPropertyTranslator::setPropertyValue( const ::rtl::OUString& aPropertyName, const Any& aValue ) throw (UnknownPropertyException, PropertyVetoException, IllegalArgumentException, WrappedTargetException, RuntimeException)
+    void SAL_CALL OGridColumnPropertyTranslator::setPropertyValue( const ::rtl::OUString& _rPropertyName, const Any& aValue ) throw (UnknownPropertyException, PropertyVetoException, IllegalArgumentException, WrappedTargetException, RuntimeException)
     {
-        Sequence< ::rtl::OUString > aNames( &aPropertyName, 1 );
+        // we implement this by delegating it to setPropertyValues, which is to ignore unknown properties. On the other hand, our
+        // contract requires us to throw a UnknownPropertyException for unknown properties, so check this first.
+
+        if ( !getPropertySetInfo()->hasPropertyByName( _rPropertyName ) )
+            throw UnknownPropertyException( _rPropertyName, *this );
+
+        Sequence< ::rtl::OUString > aNames( &_rPropertyName, 1 );
         Sequence< Any >             aValues( &aValue, 1 );
         setPropertyValues( aNames, aValues );
     }