summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndras Timar <atimar@suse.com>2011-11-21 13:52:54 +0100
committerAndras Timar <atimar@suse.com>2011-11-21 13:52:54 +0100
commit74fdbb6a0ed4dfe616655400028637435b7bcd2f (patch)
tree1a72b5af312ba02aa61b3f0cfac267ac067c8930
parenta38543afeff62c0999d29062be5068f275194f85 (diff)
added LibreOffice name to the list fdo#43108
-rw-r--r--helpcontent2/source/text/shared/guide/digital_signatures.xhp4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/helpcontent2/source/text/shared/guide/digital_signatures.xhp b/helpcontent2/source/text/shared/guide/digital_signatures.xhp
index f4dc10050e..3ef7b6dd89 100644
--- a/helpcontent2/source/text/shared/guide/digital_signatures.xhp
+++ b/helpcontent2/source/text/shared/guide/digital_signatures.xhp
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="hd_id0821200910191787" role="heading" level="3" l10n="NEW">Signatures and software versions</paragraph>
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id0821200910191747" role="paragraph" l10n="NEW">The signing of contents got changed with OpenOffice.org 3.2 and StarOffice 9.2. Now all contents of the files, except the signature file itself (META-INF/documentsignatures.xml) are signed. </paragraph>
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id0821200910191774" role="paragraph" l10n="NEW">When you sign a document with OpenOffice.org 3.2 or StarOffice 9.2 or a later version, and you open that document in an older version of the software, the signature will be displayed as "invalid". Signatures created with older versions of the software will be marked with "only parts of the documents are signed" when loaded in the newer software.</paragraph>
- <paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id2008200911583098" role="note" l10n="NEW">When you load an ODF document, you might see an icon in the status bar and the status field in the dialog that indicates that the document is only partially signed. This status will appear when the signature and certificate are valid, but they were created with a version of OpenOffice.org before 3.2 or StarOffice before 9.2. In versions of OpenOffice.org before 3.0 or StarOffice before 9.0, the document signature was applied to the main contents, pictures and embedded objects only and some contents, like macros, were not signed. In OpenOffice.org 3.0 and StarOffice 9.0 the document signature was applied to most content, including macros. However, the mimetype and the content of the META-INF folder were not signed. And in OpenOffice.org 3.2 and StarOffice 9.2 all contents, except the signature file itself (META-INF/documentsignatures.xml), are signed.</paragraph>
+ <paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id2008200911583098" role="note" l10n="NEW">When you load an ODF document, you might see an icon in the status bar and the status field in the dialog that indicates that the document is only partially signed. This status will appear when the signature and certificate are valid, but they were created with a version of OpenOffice.org before 3.2 or StarOffice before 9.2. In versions of OpenOffice.org before 3.0 or StarOffice before 9.0, the document signature was applied to the main contents, pictures and embedded objects only and some contents, like macros, were not signed. In OpenOffice.org 3.0 and StarOffice 9.0 the document signature was applied to most content, including macros. However, the mimetype and the content of the META-INF folder were not signed. And in OpenOffice.org 3.2, StarOffice 9.2, and all versions of LibreOffice all contents, except the signature file itself (META-INF/documentsignatures.xml), are signed.</paragraph>
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="hd_id9354228" role="heading" level="2" l10n="NEW">Security Warnings</paragraph>
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id2372508" role="paragraph" l10n="NEW">When you receive a signed document, and the software reports that the signature is valid, this does not mean that you can be absolutely sure that the document is the same that the sender has sent. Signing documents with software certificates is not a perfectly secure method. Numerous ways are possible to circumvent the security features.</paragraph>
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id7953123" role="paragraph" l10n="NEW">Example: Think about someone who wants to camouflage his identity to be a sender from your bank. He can easily get a certificate using a false name, then send you any signed e-mail pretending he is working for your bank. You will get that e-mail, and the e-mail or the document within has the "valid signed" icon. </paragraph>
@@ -113,4 +113,4 @@
<paragraph xml-lang="en-US" id="par_id3448591" role="paragraph" l10n="NEW"><link href="text/shared/guide/digitalsign_receive.xhp">Opening a document using WebDAV over HTTPS</link></paragraph>
</section>
</body>
-</helpdocument> \ No newline at end of file
+</helpdocument>