diff options
| author | Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com> | 2021-10-14 17:05:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com> | 2021-10-14 18:37:47 +0200 |
| commit | 6f761939196eb0963c218b2ac9263f358f946675 (patch) | |
| tree | fa6b46ad9b1c333d902576b39200454725567d83 /ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon | |
| parent | e799d70c646748b90879d7b31c2b28fe8c0853d8 (diff) | |
Finish merging two identical conditional branches
The code in the branches used to do different things before commit
26e6d4b05ab444e6a7529ffcac7fbe592fc94833, which technically made
aProperties a copy of rProperties in both cases, only in one case
there were some checks that didn't affect the end result. This was
progressively cleaned up in commits e06afb0c9546ddcde1cedd75f59001396ac6fdf2
and 39bbfa61653ba7c3cca0aed739559914c78edc89, and this one drops
the last redundant bit.
The only question that remains is: did the initial change
actually intend this result?
Change-Id: Id26d50f7f7bdfed3bfb436e0c8bbbf6b3a0dbf98
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123524
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon')
| -rw-r--r-- | ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/webdavcontent.cxx | 21 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/webdavcontent.cxx b/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/webdavcontent.cxx index c613926e445d..45907b8a53d3 100644 --- a/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/webdavcontent.cxx +++ b/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/webdavcontent.cxx @@ -1364,24 +1364,11 @@ uno::Reference< sdbc::XRow > Content::getPropertyValues( // Only DAV resources support PROPFIND std::vector< OUString > aPropNames; - uno::Sequence< beans::Property > aProperties( - rProperties.getLength() ); - - if ( !m_aFailedPropNames.empty() ) - { - sal_Int32 nProps = rProperties.getLength(); - std::copy(rProperties.begin(), rProperties.end(), aProperties.begin()); - - aProperties.realloc( nProps ); - } - else - { - aProperties = rProperties; - } - - if ( aProperties.hasElements() ) + // FIXME: Should m_aFailedPropNames be checked here? It got effectively + // ignored since commit 26e6d4b05ab444e6a7529ffcac7fbe592fc94833. + if ( rProperties.hasElements() ) ContentProperties::UCBNamesToDAVNames( - aProperties, aPropNames ); + rProperties, aPropNames ); if ( !aPropNames.empty() ) { |