Same with MixDocument(). But this one has additional bottleneck...

With the removal of existing cells. So, this change is not enough to
make this operation fly.

Change-Id: Ic468375f6d0c28e2cc7d5391fb0565d53ee7fb4e

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/sc/source/core/data/table2.cxx b/sc/source/core/data/table2.cxx
index 2eca7adc37e2..4af76be44514 100644
--- a/sc/source/core/data/table2.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/core/data/table2.cxx
@@ -831,20 +831,22 @@ void ScTable::CopyFromClip(
 }
 
 
-void ScTable::MixData( SCCOL nCol1, SCROW nRow1, SCCOL nCol2, SCROW nRow2,
-                            sal_uInt16 nFunction, bool bSkipEmpty, ScTable* pSrcTab )
+void ScTable::MixData(
+    sc::MixDocContext& rCxt, SCCOL nCol1, SCROW nRow1, SCCOL nCol2, SCROW nRow2,
+    sal_uInt16 nFunction, bool bSkipEmpty, const ScTable* pSrcTab )
 {
     for (SCCOL i=nCol1; i<=nCol2; i++)
-        aCol[i].MixData( nRow1, nRow2, nFunction, bSkipEmpty, pSrcTab->aCol[i] );
+        aCol[i].MixData(rCxt, nRow1, nRow2, nFunction, bSkipEmpty, pSrcTab->aCol[i]);
 }
 
 
 //  Markierung von diesem Dokument
-void ScTable::MixMarked( const ScMarkData& rMark, sal_uInt16 nFunction,
-                        bool bSkipEmpty, ScTable* pSrcTab )
+void ScTable::MixMarked(
+    sc::MixDocContext& rCxt, const ScMarkData& rMark, sal_uInt16 nFunction,
+    bool bSkipEmpty, const ScTable* pSrcTab )
 {
     for (SCCOL i=0; i<=MAXCOL; i++)
-        aCol[i].MixMarked( rMark, nFunction, bSkipEmpty, pSrcTab->aCol[i] );
+        aCol[i].MixMarked(rCxt, rMark, nFunction, bSkipEmpty, pSrcTab->aCol[i]);
 }