sorted_vector: operator[] returning by value doesn't make much sense

Change-Id: I43f344fb06e45cc883c8c6cd9bbfbe29ef9c01f7

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 21 deletions

diff --git a/o3tl/inc/o3tl/sorted_vector.hxx b/o3tl/inc/o3tl/sorted_vector.hxx
index b6f0d3ac6e8a..0386680a9914 100644
--- a/o3tl/inc/o3tl/sorted_vector.hxx
+++ b/o3tl/inc/o3tl/sorted_vector.hxx
@@ -94,37 +94,16 @@ public:
         return base_t::end();
     }
 
-    // Return a value rather than a reference, so that the vector cannot be directly updated,
-    // and the sorted invariant violated.
-    Value front()
-    {
-        return base_t::front();
-    }
-
     const Value& front() const
     {
         return base_t::front();
     }
 
-    // Return a value rather than a reference, so that the vector cannot be directly updated,
-    // and the sorted invariant violated.
-    Value back()
-    {
-        return base_t::back();
-    }
-
     const Value& back() const
     {
         return base_t::back();
     }
 
-    // Return a value rather than a reference, so that the vector cannot be directly updated,
-    // and the sorted invariant violated.
-    Value operator[]( size_t index )
-    {
-        return base_t::operator[]( index );
-    }
-
     const Value& operator[]( size_t index ) const
     {
         return base_t::operator[]( index );