diff options
author | Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> | 2017-08-18 17:25:17 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> | 2017-08-23 16:38:11 +0200 |
commit | cac440fd5a76f4a76565466cd9df363f5634e8bd (patch) | |
tree | d3404c79b553ec9523f0bc0c28b56b1649bd18e4 | |
parent | 20989f6c206619e527d57d79d5b8b7c8ef3fe70d (diff) |
tdf#99692 sw: fix the fix: don't set bNullContent if node was split
When showing the redlines in rhbz908615-13.odt, the following assertion
happens:
Assertion `IDocumentMarkAccess::IsLegalPaMForCrossRefHeadingBookmark(rPaM) && "<CrossRefBookmark::CrossRefBookmark(..)>" "- creation of cross-reference bookmark with an illegal PaM that does not expand over exactly one whole paragraph."' failed.
This is because in DocumentContentOperationsManager::MoveRange() the
flag bNullContent is set after the node has been split; in this case the
nContent is of course always 0.
Later the function then restores aSavePam to the index 0 of the next
node, when it actually shouldn't do anything because the JoinNext()
already positioned it correctly at the merge-index of the re-joined node.
(regression from 850795942b3e168cab8ce88b4f2b421945ff29ca)
Change-Id: I64d50e70b19e2fd81537a9771fa8706898b17642
(cherry picked from commit 6a018363791945b6fd7f04f2aa311e4f4753f6aa)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/41304
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk>
-rw-r--r-- | sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx index 32f7da7e99de..cfc4f4fe9605 100644 --- a/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx +++ b/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx @@ -2039,7 +2039,8 @@ bool DocumentContentOperationsManager::MoveRange( SwPaM& rPaM, SwPosition& rPos, // the manipulated range. // tdf#99692 don't Move() back if that would end up in another node // because moving backward is not necessarily the inverse of forward then. - const bool bNullContent = aSavePam.GetPoint()->nContent == 0; + // (but do Move() back if we have split the node) + const bool bNullContent = !bSplit && aSavePam.GetPoint()->nContent == 0; if( bNullContent ) { aSavePam.GetPoint()->nNode--; |