summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-12-22drm/i915/gt: Pull intel_gt_init_hw() into intel_gt_resume()Chris Wilson1-19/+1
Since intel_gt_resume() is always immediately proceeded by init_hw, pull the call into intel_gt_resume, where we have the rpm and fw already held. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222144046.1674865-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-13drm/i915: Introduce new macros for tracingVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota1-2/+2
New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine name with contexts and requests tracing in i915. Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com
2019-11-01drm/i915: Defer rc6 shutdown to suspend_lateChris Wilson1-1/+3
Currently we shutdown rc6 during i915_gem_resume() but this is called during the preparation phase (i915_drm_prepare) for all suspend paths, but we only want to shutdown rc6 for S3+. Move the actual shutdown to i915_gem_suspend_late(). We then need to differentiate between suspend targets, to distinguish S0 (s2idle) where the device is kept awake but needs to be in a low power mode (the same as runtime suspend) from the device suspend levels where we lose control of HW and so must disable any HW access to dangling memory. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111909 Fixes: c113236718e8 ("drm/i915: Extract GT render sleep (rc6) management") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_suspend/power-S0 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-01drm/i915/gt: Move user_forcewake application to GTChris Wilson1-22/+0
We already track the debugfs user_forcewake on the GT, so it is natural to pull the suspend/resume handling under gt/ as well. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-01drm/i915/gem: Leave reloading kernel context on resume to GTChris Wilson1-30/+0
As we already do reload the kernel context in intel_gt_resume, repeating that action inside i915_gem_resume() as well is redundant. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-01drm/i915/gt: Call intel_gt_sanitize() directlyChris Wilson1-5/+0
Assume all responsibility for operating on the HW to sanitize the GT state upon load/resume in intel_gt_sanitize() itself. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101141009.15581-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-23drm/i915/gt: Replace hangcheck by heartbeatsChris Wilson1-2/+0
Replace sampling the engine state every so often with a periodic heartbeat request to measure the health of an engine. This is coupled with the forced-preemption to allow long running requests to survive so long as they do not block other users. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-22drm/i915: Teach record_defaults to operate on the intel_gtChris Wilson1-6/+1
Again we wish to operate on the engines, which are owned by the intel_gt. As such it is easier, and much more consistent, to pass the intel_gt parameter. v2: Unexport i915_gem_load_power_context() Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022141935.15733-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-21drm/i915: Remove pm park/unpark notificationsChris Wilson1-25/+0
With the last user, i915_vma_parked(), retired, there are no more users of the per-gt pm notifications and we can remove the unused infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-21drm/i915: Lift i915_vma_parked() onto the gtChris Wilson1-1/+0
Currently even though i915_vma_parked() operates on a per-gt struct, it is called from a global pm notify. This oddity was only because the long term plan is to decouple the vma cache from the pm notification, but right now the oddity stands out like a sore thumb! Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Drop struct_mutex from around GEM initialisationChris Wilson1-2/+0
We no longer need to placate lockdep by holding struct_mutex for our initialisation, so don't. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Move global activity tracking from GEM to GTChris Wilson1-10/+1
As our global unpark/park keep track of the number of active users, we can simply move the accounting from the GEM layer to the base GT layer. It was placed originally inside GEM to benefit from the 100ms extra delay on idleness, but that has been eliminated and now there is no substantive difference between the layers. In moving it, we move another piece of the puzzle out from underneath struct_mutex. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Move request runtime management onto gtChris Wilson1-24/+4
Requests are run from the gt and are tided into the gt runtime power management, so pull the runtime request management under gt/ Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_requestChris Wilson1-3/+1
wait_for_timelines is essentially the same loop as retiring requests (with an extra timeout), so merge the two into one routine. v2: i915_retire_requests_timeout and keep VT'd w/a as !interruptible Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Remove the GEM idle workerChris Wilson1-26/+2
Nothing inside the idle worker now requires struct_mutex, so we can remove the indirection of using our own worker. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Drop struct_mutex from around i915_retire_requests()Chris Wilson1-28/+17
We don't need to hold struct_mutex now for retiring requests, so drop it from i915_retire_requests() and i915_gem_wait_for_idle(), finally removing I915_WAIT_LOCKED for good. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Move idle barrier cleanup into engine-pmChris Wilson1-19/+0
Now that we now longer need to guarantee that the active callback is under the struct_mutex, we can lift it out of the i915_gem_park() and into the engine parking itself. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutexChris Wilson1-6/+3
Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its own mutex handling for active/retire. This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules, nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to interact with the dma_fence callback lists). The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context, etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients (eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads. v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :( Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-27drm/i915: Extract GT render sleep (rc6) managementAndi Shyti1-1/+1
Continuing the theme of breaking intel_pm.c up in a reasonable chunk of powermanagement utilities, pull out the rc6 setup into its GT handler. Based on a patch by Chris Wilson. Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919143840.20384-1-andi.shyti@intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927110849.28734-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-12drm/i915/pmu: Use GT parked for estimating RC6 while asleepChris Wilson1-0/+22
As we track when we put the GT device to sleep upon idling, we can use that callback to sample the current rc6 counters and record the timestamp for estimating samples after that point while asleep. v2: Stick to using ktime_t v3: Track user_wakerefs that interfere with the new intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle v4: No need for parked/unparked estimation if !CONFIG_PM v5: Keep timer park/unpark logic as was v6: Refactor duplicated estimate/update rc6 logic v7: Pull intel_get_pm_get_if_awake() out from the pmu->lock. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105010 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190912124813.19225-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-11drm/i915: Move GT init to intel_gt.cTvrtko Ursulin1-1/+1
Code in i915_gem_init_hw is all about GT init so move it to intel_gt.c renaming to intel_gt_init_hw. Existing intel_gt_init_hw is renamed to intel_gt_init_hw_early since it is currently called from driver probe. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190910143823.10686-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2019-09-10drm/i915: Perform GGTT restore much earlier during resumeChris Wilson1-3/+0
As soon as we re-enable the various functions within the HW, they may go off and read data via a GGTT offset. Hence, if we have not yet restored the GGTT PTE before then, they may read and even *write* random locations in memory. Detected by DMAR faults during resume. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909110011.8958-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-06drm/i915: Hook up GT power managementAndi Shyti1-0/+1
Refactor the GT power management interface to work through the GT now that it is under the control of gt/ Based on a patch by Chris Wilson. Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190905111403.10071-1-andi.shyti@intel.com
2019-08-15drm/i915/gt: Track timeline activeness in enter/exitChris Wilson1-1/+0
Lift moving the timeline to/from the active_list on enter/exit in order to shorten the active tracking span in comparison to the existing pin/unpin. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190815205709.24285-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-08drm/i915: Defer final intel_wakeref_put to process contextChris Wilson1-10/+3
As we need to acquire a mutex to serialise the final intel_wakeref_put, we need to ensure that we are in process context at that time. However, we want to allow operation on the intel_wakeref from inside timer and other hardirq context, which means that need to defer that final put to a workqueue. Inside the final wakeref puts, we are safe to operate in any context, as we are simply marking up the HW and state tracking for the potential sleep. It's only the serialisation with the potential sleeping getting that requires careful wait avoidance. This allows us to retain the immediate processing as before (we only need to sleep over the same races as the current mutex_lock). v2: Add a selftest to ensure we exercise the code while lockdep watches. v3: That test was extremely loud and complained about many things! v4: Not a whale! Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111295 References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111245 References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111256 Fixes: 18398904ca9e ("drm/i915: Only recover active engines") Fixes: 51fbd8de87dc ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190808202758.10453-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-04drm/i915: Replace struct_mutex for batch pool serialisationChris Wilson1-3/+1
Switch to tracking activity via i915_active on individual nodes, only keeping a list of retired objects in the cache, and reaping the cache when the engine itself idles. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804124826.30272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-23drm/i915/uc: Sanitize uC when GT is sanitizedDaniele Ceraolo Spurio1-1/+0
The microcontrollers are part of GT so it makes logical sense to have them sanitized at the same time. This also fixed an issue with our status tracking where the FW load status is not reset around hibernation. Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091404.6449-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-13drm/i915/uc: Move intel functions to intel_ucDaniele Ceraolo Spurio1-3/+3
All the intel_uc_* can now be moved to work on the intel_uc structure for better encapsulation of uc-related actions. Note: I've introduced uc_to_gt instead of uc_to_i915 because the aim is to move everything to be gt-focused in the medium term, so we would've had to replace it soon anyway. Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2019-07-12drm/i915/gt: Use intel_gt as the primary object for handling resetsChris Wilson1-12/+13
Having taken the first step in encapsulating the functionality by moving the related files under gt/, the next step is to start encapsulating by passing around the relevant structs rather than the global drm_i915_private. In this step, we pass intel_gt to intel_reset.c Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712192953.9187-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-26drm/i915: Lift intel_engines_resume() to callersChris Wilson1-3/+4
Since the reset path wants to recover the engines itself, it only wants to reinitialise the hardware using i915_gem_init_hw(). Pull the call to intel_engines_resume() to the module init/resume path so we can avoid it during reset. Fixes: 79ffac8599c4 ("drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190626154549.10066-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-25drm/i915: Rename intel_wakeref_[is]_activeChris Wilson1-1/+2
Our general rule is to use is/has as the verb for boolean functions, rename intel_wakeref_active to intel_wakeref_is_active so the question being asked is clear. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190625130128.11009-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-25drm/i915/gt: Pass intel_gt to pm routinesChris Wilson1-1/+1
Switch from passing the i915 container to newly named struct intel_gt. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190625130128.11009-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-21drm/i915: Rename i915_timeline to intel_timeline and move under gtTvrtko Ursulin1-1/+1
Move all timeline code under gt and rename to intel_gt prefix. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621070811.7006-32-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2019-06-15drm/i915: Avoid tainting i915_gem_park() with wakeref.lockChris Wilson1-9/+8
While we need to flush the wakeref before parking, we do not need to perform the i915_gem_park() itself underneath the wakeref lock, merely the struct_mutex. If we rearrange the locks, we can avoid the unnecessary tainting. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614220616.24932-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-14drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switchChris Wilson1-1/+19
We need to keep the context image pinned in memory until after the GPU has finished writing into it. Since it continues to write as we signal the final breadcrumb, we need to keep it pinned until the request after it is complete. Currently we know the order in which requests execute on each engine, and so to remove that presumption we need to identify a request/context-switch we know must occur after our completion. Any request queued after the signal must imply a context switch, for simplicity we use a fresh request from the kernel context. The sequence of operations for keeping the context pinned until saved is: - On context activation, we preallocate a node for each physical engine the context may operate on. This is to avoid allocations during unpinning, which may be from inside FS_RECLAIM context (aka the shrinker) - On context deactivation on retirement of the last active request (which is before we know the context has been saved), we add the preallocated node onto a barrier list on each engine - On engine idling, we emit a switch to kernel context. When this switch completes, we know that all previous contexts must have been saved, and so on retiring this request we can finally unpin all the contexts that were marked as deactivated prior to the switch. We can enhance this in future by flushing all the idle contexts on a regular heartbeat pulse of a switch to kernel context, which will also be used to check for hung engines. v2: intel_context_active_acquire/_release Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-13drm/i915: Move fence register tracking from i915->mm to ggttChris Wilson1-1/+1
As the fence registers only apply to regions inside the GGTT is makes more sense that we track these as part of the i915_ggtt and not the general mm. In the next patch, we will then pull the register locking underneath the i915_ggtt.mutex. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613073254.24048-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-12drm/i915: Combine unbound/bound list tracking for objectsChris Wilson1-3/+27
With async binding, we don't want to manage a bound/unbound list as we may end up running before we even acquire the pages. All that is required is keeping track of shrinkable objects, so reduce it to the minimum list. Fixes: 6951e5893b48 ("drm/i915: Move GEM object domain management from struct_mutex to local") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190612105720.30310-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-06drm/i915: Report an earlier wedged event when suspending the enginesChris Wilson1-1/+1
On i915_gem_load_power_context() we do care whether or not we succeed in completing the switch back to the kernel context (via idling the engines). Currently, we detect if an error occurs while we wait, but we do not report one if it occurred beforehand (and the status of the switch is undefined). Check the current terminally wedged status on entering the wait, and report it after flushing the requests, as if it had occurred during our own wait. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110824 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190531113245.30042-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-31drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction listChris Wilson1-0/+1
Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk. If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking. Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-28drm/i915: Move GEM object domain management from struct_mutex to localChris Wilson1-3/+4
Use the per-object local lock to control the cache domain of the individual GEM objects, not struct_mutex. This is a huge leap forward for us in terms of object-level synchronisation; execbuffers are coordinated using the ww_mutex and pread/pwrite is finally fully serialised again. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-28drm/i915: Move more GEM objects under gem/Chris Wilson1-0/+251
Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk