summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-09-14drm: Differentiate the lack of an interface from invalid parameterChris Wilson1-4/+4
If the ioctl is not supported on a particular piece of HW/driver combination, report ENOTSUP (aka EOPNOTSUPP) so that it can be easily distinguished from both the lack of the ioctl and from a regular invalid parameter. v2: Across all the kms ioctls we had a mixture of reporting EINVAL, ENODEV and a few ENOTSUPP (most where EINVAL) for a failed drm_core_check_feature(). Update everybody to report ENOTSUPP. v3: ENOTSUPP is an internal errno! It's value (524) does not correspond to a POSIX errno, the one we want is ENOTSUP. However, uapi/asm-generic/errno.h doesn't include ENOTSUP but man errno says "ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP have the same value on Linux, but according to POSIX.1 these error values should be distinct." so use EOPNOTSUPP as its equivalent. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> #v2 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180913192050.24812-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-07-02drm: Use kvzalloc for allocating blob property memoryMichel Dänzer1-3/+3
The property size may be controlled by userspace, can be large (I've seen failure with order 4, i.e. 16 pages / 64 KB) and doesn't need to be physically contiguous. Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180629142710.2069-1-michel@daenzer.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2018-04-27drm: Don't pass the index to drm_property_add_enum()Ville Syrjälä1-14/+13
drm_property_add_enum() can calculate the index itself just fine, so no point in having the caller pass it in. Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180316190420.26734-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
2018-03-16Revert "drm: Use a flexible array member for blob property data"Ville Syrjälä1-0/+1
Using a flexible array for the blob data was a mistake by me. It forces all users of the blob data to cast blob->data to something else. void* is clearly superior so let's go back to the original scheme. Not a clean revert as the code has moved. This reverts commit d63f5e6bf6f2a1573ea39c9937cdf5ab0b3a4b77. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223192506.29992-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-07drm: Reject bad property flag combinationsVille Syrjälä1-6/+23
Pimp drm_property_type_valid() to check for more fails with the property flags. Also make the check before adding the property, and bail out if things look bad. Since we're now chekcing for more than the type let's also change the function name to drm_property_flags_valid(). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306164849.2862-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-07drm: Make property flags u32Ville Syrjälä1-20/+21
The property flags are part of the uabi and we have 32 bits for them. Pass them around as u32 internally as well, instead of a signed int. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306164849.2862-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-07drm: WARN when trying to add enum value > 63 to a bitmask propertyVille Syrjälä1-2/+2
Enum values >63 with a bitmask property is a programmer error. WARN when someone is attempting this. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306164849.2862-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-07drm: WARN when trying add enum values to non-enum/bitmask propertiesVille Syrjälä1-2/+2
Trying to add enum values to non-enum/bitmask properties is a programmer mistake. WARN to make sure the developers notice their mistake. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306164849.2862-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-07drm: Reject replacing property enum valuesVille Syrjälä1-8/+3
If the property already has the enum value WARN and bail. Replacing enum values doesn't make sense to me. Throw out the pointless list_empty() while at it. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306164849.2862-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-06drm: Check property/enum name lengthVille Syrjälä1-0/+6
Reject requests to add properties/enums with an overly long name. Previously we would have just silently truncated the string and exposed it userspace. v2: drm_property_create() returns a pointer Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302140300.31110-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2018-03-06drm: Don't create properties without namesVille Syrjälä1-4/+2
Creating a property that doesn't have a name makes no sense to me. Don't allow it. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302132544.12491-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2017-10-12drm: Pass struct drm_file * to __drm_mode_object_find [v2]Keith Packard1-3/+3
This will allow __drm_mode_object_file to be extended to perform access control checks based on the file in use. v2: Also fix up vboxvideo driver in staging [airlied: merging early as this is an API change] Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2017-07-14drm: rename, adjust and export drm_atomic_replace_property_blobPeter Rosin1-0/+23
The function has little to do with atomic, it's just where it has so far been needed. So, rename it to drm_property_replace_blob, move it to drm_property.c and export it. Change the semantics to return whether the blob was replaced instead of using an extra argument for that. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170713162538.22788-2-peda@axentia.se
2017-04-12drm: Fix get_property logic fumbleDaniel Vetter1-1/+1
Yet again I've proven that I can't negate conditions :( Testcase: igt/kms_properties/get_property-sanity Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Fixes: eb8eb02ed850 ("drm: Drop modeset_lock_all from the getproperty ioctl") Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170410115445.13829-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2017-04-05drm: Drop modeset_lock_all from the getproperty ioctlDaniel Vetter1-43/+29
Properties, i.e. the struct drm_property specifying the type and value range of a property, not the instantiation on a given object, are invariant over the lifetime of a driver. Hence no locking at all is needed, we can just remove it. While at it give the function some love and simplify it, to get it under the 80 char limit: - Straighten the loops to reduce the nesting. - use u64_to_user_ptr casting helper - use put_user for fixed u64 copies. Note there's a small behavioural change in that we now copy parts of the values to userspace if the arrays are a bit too small. Since userspace will immediately retry anyway, this doesn't matter. Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170403083304.9083-7-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2017-02-28drm: Introduce drm_property_blob_{get,put}()Thierry Reding1-20/+20
For consistency with other reference counting APIs in the kernel, add drm_property_blob_get() and drm_property_blob_put() to reference count DRM blob properties. Compatibility aliases are added to keep existing code working. To help speed up the transition, all the instances of the old functions in the DRM core are already replaced in this commit. A semantic patch is provided that can be used to convert all drivers to the new helpers. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170228144643.5668-7-thierry.reding@gmail.com
2017-02-28drm: Introduce drm_mode_object_{get,put}()Thierry Reding1-3/+3
For consistency with other reference counting APIs in the kernel, add drm_mode_object_get() and drm_mode_object_put() to reference count DRM mode objects. Compatibility aliases are added to keep existing code working. To help speed up the transition, all the instances of the old functions in the DRM core are already replaced in this commit. A semantic patch is provided that can be used to convert all drivers to the new helpers. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170228144643.5668-3-thierry.reding@gmail.com
2017-02-28drm: Rename drm_mode_object_get()Thierry Reding1-3/+3
Subsequent patches will introduce reference counting APIs that are more consistent with similar APIs throughout the Linux kernel. These APIs use the _get() and _put() suffixes and will collide with this existing function. Rename the function to drm_mode_object_add() which is a slightly more accurate description of what it does. Also the kerneldoc for this function gives an indication that it's badly named because it doesn't actually acquire a reference to anything. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170228144643.5668-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com
2017-01-25drm/kms-core: Use recommened kerneldoc for struct member refsDaniel Vetter1-2/+2
I just learned that &struct_name.member_name works and looks pretty even. It doesn't (yet) link to the member directly though, which would be really good for big structures or vfunc tables (where the per-member kerneldoc tends to be long). Also some minor drive-by polish where it makes sense, I read a lot of docs ... v2: Review from Eric. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170125062657.19270-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2016-12-30drm/doc: use preferred struct reference in kernel-docDaniel Vetter1-1/+1
sed -e 's/\( \* .*\)struct &\([_a-z]*\)/\1\&struct \2/' -i Originally I wasnt a friend of this style because I thought a line-break between the "&struct" and "foo" part would break it. But a quick test shows that " * &struct \n * foo\n" works pefectly well with current kernel-doc. So time to mass-apply these changes! Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483044517-5770-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2016-11-28drm: Use u64_to_user_ptr() helper for blob ioctlsChris Wilson1-6/+6
Remove the ugly sparse casts by using the helper u64_to_user_ptr() instead. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161127170910.29106-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-11-24drm/doc: Fix links in drm_property.cDaniel Vetter1-21/+21
One of the functions was missing () to make the autolinks work, unfortunately copy-pasted a few times all over. Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161123192327.28819-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2016-09-07Revert "drm: Unify handling of blob and object properties"Maarten Lankhorst1-5/+18
This reverts commit 77953bd136d2a70bca2dc93b3ccda07a2b37076f. This causes a kernel panic when trying to assign a blob to a property, and has obviously never been tested. Fixes: 77953bd136d2 ("drm: Unify handling of blob and object properties") Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Liu Ying <gnuiyl@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/8c0d3482-1bb5-6a15-b105-6bda2b31b5dc@linux.intel.com
2016-08-29drm/doc: Polish docs for drm_property&drm_property_blobDaniel Vetter1-97/+56
- remove kerneldoc for drm-internal functions - drm_property_replace_global_blob isn't actually atomic, and doesn't need to be. Update docs&comments to match - document all the types and try to link things a bit better - nits all over v2: Appease checkpatch in the moved code (Archit) Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2016-08-29drm: Unify handling of blob and object propertiesDaniel Vetter1-18/+5
They work exactly the same now, after the refcounting unification a bit ago. The only reason they're distinct is backwards compat with existing userspace. Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2016-08-29drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]Daniel Vetter1-0/+953
This just contains the base property classes and all the code to handle blobs. I think for any kind of standardized/shared properties it's better to have separate files - this is fairly big already as-is. v2: resurrect misplaced hunk (Daniel Stone) Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-7-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-05-01 17:57:02 +0000