summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c54
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index 6dad2efd5e27..8bc093082511 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -437,13 +437,45 @@ static int vlv_calc_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int min_cdclk)
return 200000;
}
+static u8 vlv_calc_voltage_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk)
+{
+ if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
+ if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
+ return 2;
+ else if (cdclk >= 266667)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
+ * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
+ * CCK divider into the Punit register.
+ */
+ return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
+ }
+}
+
static void vlv_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
{
+ u32 val;
+
cdclk_state->vco = vlv_get_hpll_vco(dev_priv);
cdclk_state->cdclk = vlv_get_cck_clock(dev_priv, "cdclk",
CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL,
cdclk_state->vco);
+
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
+ val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
+
+ if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK) >>
+ DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT;
+ else
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV) >>
+ DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV;
}
static void vlv_program_pfi_credits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -486,7 +518,7 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
{
int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
- u32 val, cmd;
+ u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
/* There are cases where we can end up here with power domains
* off and a CDCLK frequency other than the minimum, like when
@@ -496,13 +528,6 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*/
intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
- if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
- cmd = 2;
- else if (cdclk == 266667)
- cmd = 1;
- else
- cmd = 0;
-
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
@@ -562,7 +587,7 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
{
int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
- u32 val, cmd;
+ u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
switch (cdclk) {
case 333333:
@@ -583,13 +608,6 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
*/
intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
- /*
- * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
- * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
- * CCK divider into the Punit register.
- */
- cmd = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
-
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
@@ -1859,11 +1877,15 @@ static int vlv_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, min_cdclk);
intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
+ intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage_level =
+ vlv_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv, cdclk);
if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
+ intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage_level =
+ vlv_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv, cdclk);
} else {
intel_state->cdclk.actual =
intel_state->cdclk.logical;