summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUmesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>2022-01-24 18:01:24 -0800
committerTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>2022-02-01 08:59:25 +0000
commit7d73c602154df56802a9e75ac212505fc1e9a2b6 (patch)
treea877253d32c55b0c902b1ea2a8bd1f264120ec46
parent3c6f13ad723e7206f03bb2752b01d18202b7fc9d (diff)
drm/i915/pmu: Fix KMD and GuC race on accessing busyness
GuC updates shared memory and KMD reads it. Since this is not synchronized, we run into a race where the value read is inconsistent. Sometimes the inconsistency is in reading the upper MSB bytes of the last_switch_in value. 2 types of cases are seen - upper 8 bits are zero and upper 24 bits are zero. Since these are non-zero values, it is not trivial to determine validity of these values. Instead we read the values multiple times until they are consistent. In test runs, 3 attempts results in consistent values. The upper bound is set to 6 attempts and may need to be tuned as per any new occurences. Since the duration that gt is parked can vary, the patch also updates the gt timestamp on unpark before starting the worker. v2: - Initialize i - Use READ_ONCE to access engine record Fixes: 77cdd054dd2c ("drm/i915/pmu: Connect engine busyness stats from GuC to pmu") Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220125020124.788679-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 512712a824de9b856a4e61343e3e4390eba2c391) Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c58
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index fcec2cb833af..154ad726e266 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -1113,6 +1113,19 @@ __extend_last_switch(struct intel_guc *guc, u64 *prev_start, u32 new_start)
if (new_start == lower_32_bits(*prev_start))
return;
+ /*
+ * When gt is unparked, we update the gt timestamp and start the ping
+ * worker that updates the gt_stamp every POLL_TIME_CLKS. As long as gt
+ * is unparked, all switched in contexts will have a start time that is
+ * within +/- POLL_TIME_CLKS of the most recent gt_stamp.
+ *
+ * If neither gt_stamp nor new_start has rolled over, then the
+ * gt_stamp_hi does not need to be adjusted, however if one of them has
+ * rolled over, we need to adjust gt_stamp_hi accordingly.
+ *
+ * The below conditions address the cases of new_start rollover and
+ * gt_stamp_last rollover respectively.
+ */
if (new_start < gt_stamp_last &&
(new_start - gt_stamp_last) <= POLL_TIME_CLKS)
gt_stamp_hi++;
@@ -1124,17 +1137,45 @@ __extend_last_switch(struct intel_guc *guc, u64 *prev_start, u32 new_start)
*prev_start = ((u64)gt_stamp_hi << 32) | new_start;
}
-static void guc_update_engine_gt_clks(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+/*
+ * GuC updates shared memory and KMD reads it. Since this is not synchronized,
+ * we run into a race where the value read is inconsistent. Sometimes the
+ * inconsistency is in reading the upper MSB bytes of the last_in value when
+ * this race occurs. 2 types of cases are seen - upper 8 bits are zero and upper
+ * 24 bits are zero. Since these are non-zero values, it is non-trivial to
+ * determine validity of these values. Instead we read the values multiple times
+ * until they are consistent. In test runs, 3 attempts results in consistent
+ * values. The upper bound is set to 6 attempts and may need to be tuned as per
+ * any new occurences.
+ */
+static void __get_engine_usage_record(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ u32 *last_in, u32 *id, u32 *total)
{
struct guc_engine_usage_record *rec = intel_guc_engine_usage(engine);
+ int i = 0;
+
+ do {
+ *last_in = READ_ONCE(rec->last_switch_in_stamp);
+ *id = READ_ONCE(rec->current_context_index);
+ *total = READ_ONCE(rec->total_runtime);
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(rec->last_switch_in_stamp) == *last_in &&
+ READ_ONCE(rec->current_context_index) == *id &&
+ READ_ONCE(rec->total_runtime) == *total)
+ break;
+ } while (++i < 6);
+}
+
+static void guc_update_engine_gt_clks(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
struct intel_engine_guc_stats *stats = &engine->stats.guc;
struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
- u32 last_switch = rec->last_switch_in_stamp;
- u32 ctx_id = rec->current_context_index;
- u32 total = rec->total_runtime;
+ u32 last_switch, ctx_id, total;
lockdep_assert_held(&guc->timestamp.lock);
+ __get_engine_usage_record(engine, &last_switch, &ctx_id, &total);
+
stats->running = ctx_id != ~0U && last_switch;
if (stats->running)
__extend_last_switch(guc, &stats->start_gt_clk, last_switch);
@@ -1236,6 +1277,10 @@ static ktime_t guc_engine_busyness(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, ktime_t *now)
if (!in_reset && intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt)) {
stats_saved = *stats;
gt_stamp_saved = guc->timestamp.gt_stamp;
+ /*
+ * Update gt_clks, then gt timestamp to simplify the 'gt_stamp -
+ * start_gt_clk' calculation below for active engines.
+ */
guc_update_engine_gt_clks(engine);
guc_update_pm_timestamp(guc, now);
intel_gt_pm_put_async(gt);
@@ -1364,10 +1409,15 @@ void intel_guc_busyness_park(struct intel_gt *gt)
void intel_guc_busyness_unpark(struct intel_gt *gt)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &gt->uc.guc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ ktime_t unused;
if (!guc_submission_initialized(guc))
return;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
+ guc_update_pm_timestamp(guc, &unused);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
mod_delayed_work(system_highpri_wq, &guc->timestamp.work,
guc->timestamp.ping_delay);
}